When it comes to stablecoins, they're basically at two extremes. On one hand, you have the kind that traditional financial institutions approve of—fully transparent reserves, mountains of compliance paperwork, centralized to the core. On the other hand, there's the wild DeFi crowd—algorithm-driven, zero collateral, and ready to implode at the first sign of a black swan event.



But USDf is a bit different. It's not some wishy-washy compromise that swings between the two ends. Instead, it's more like a handy tool designed for both suit-wearing CFOs and hoodie-clad developers. There's no "we're more decentralized" or "we're more compliant" posturing—it's just a solid, practical stablecoin that works, no matter which side you're on. This pragmatic approach is actually pretty rare in today's market environment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockTalkvip
· 12-06 22:24
I've heard this routine too many times—another "covers both sides" catch-all argument? When real risks arise, we'll see who can actually hold out.
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTomvip
· 12-06 21:37
To be honest, I’m optimistic about this centrist approach, but we need real data to back it up, not just talk.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperervip
· 12-04 04:50
Well, finally there's a stablecoin that isn't all hype, that's pretty rare.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-cff9c776vip
· 12-04 04:47
From the perspective of supply and demand curves, this "offending neither side" design is essentially the Pareto optimality in economics. It sounds ideal, but the market will test its authenticity over time. For a stablecoin to truly be stable, someone ultimately has to pay for its volatility. Why should USDf be able to withstand the next black swan event? The talk sounds nice, but on-chain data will tell the real story. I've seen too many algorithm-driven stablecoins, and in the end, they all end up as Schrödinger's stability—no one cares when it's going up, but when it drops, people finally realize the reserve is just a concept. This "pragmatist" approach sounds clear-headed, but I suspect it will end up being just a mediocre compromise, pleasing neither institutions nor attracting true believers. That said, in this market, any project that dares not to hype itself is indeed pretty rare. Let's see if USDf's floor price can convince my wallet.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleepervip
· 12-04 04:46
This kind of centrist stablecoin is indeed rare, but the question is whether it can truly maintain a balance or if it's just another self-proclaimed product.
View OriginalReply0
MelonFieldvip
· 12-04 04:34
Another field that's either left or right; it's the products caught in the middle that have the hardest time surviving.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walkingvip
· 12-04 04:28
Another so-called "neutral" project—just listen and take it with a grain of salt.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)