#流动性变化 Looking back, this type of token migration scenario is not unfamiliar. After Port3 was attacked, they responded quickly by migrating tokens at a 1:1 ratio, which indeed demonstrated their determination in crisis management. Burning 162 million tokens to fill the loophole reminds me of how Tether responded to a hack in 2017. At that time, they also adopted a similar strategy by burning tokens to maintain market stability.

However, this incident serves as another reminder that even in the blockchain space, liquidity management remains a thorny issue. Migrating from Ethereum to BNB Chain may seem aimed at enhancing security, but in reality, it might just be shifting risks from one chain to another. History tells us that true security does not depend on which chain you choose, but rather on the robustness of the code and the emergency response capability of the team.

Reviewing the development of the crypto world, every major event has triggered dramatic changes in liquidity. Whether it's the Mt.Gox incident, the DAO attack, or the recent FTX collapse, each has taught us a valuable lesson. Port3's swift response is commendable, but what's more important is to learn from the experience and improve security mechanisms. After all, in this ever-changing market, liquidity is the lifeline. We must always remain vigilant, because history has a way of repeating itself in different forms.