Yesterday, I discussed an interesting idea with a few friends from the community—can we use zero-knowledge proofs to upgrade robot auditing?



Traditional auditing logic relies on reviewing operation logs, but here's the problem: you have to dig into everything the robot has done. This approach becomes awkward in autonomous systems.

But what if we change our perspective? Have the robot only prove "I completed the task" without revealing exactly how it was done. That’s the core value of zero-knowledge proofs—verifying the result, not peeking into the process.

This approach addresses two pain points at once: first, autonomous robots are most afraid of privacy leaks; once their strategy details are exposed, they lose competitiveness. Second, in large-scale network environments, if every node has to process massive operation logs, execution flows will be bogged down by information noise.

With the right technical direction, implementation efficiency can keep up.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeePhobiavip
· 12-08 19:24
The idea of zk auditing is indeed clever, but it's unclear how it will be implemented in practice.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 12-07 16:53
Applying zero-knowledge proofs to auditing is indeed brilliant—it protects privacy while shedding redundant data burdens.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7vip
· 12-07 16:45
Wow, this approach is truly brilliant—privacy and efficiency are both taken care of.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 12-07 16:45
This approach is truly brilliant—it directly hits the pain point of autonomous systems. --- Zero-knowledge proofs are really being used in the right place here, much more reliable than sifting through logs. --- But on the other hand, how do you balance privacy protection and transparency? Feels like someone could exploit the loopholes. --- That's right—nodes no longer have to handle massive logs, so efficiency can really take off. --- If this actually gets implemented, the whole audit logic will have to be rewritten. Kinda exciting! --- I agree on the privacy competitiveness aspect, but we really need to think through how nodes can verify that things are "actually completed." --- Finally, someone thought of combining privacy and efficiency—the approach is correct. --- Sounds great in theory, but I'm worried implementation might be a whole different story.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainWorkervip
· 12-07 16:30
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed interesting; it feels like you can have both privacy and efficiency at the same time.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)