There's an interesting debate brewing around how companies should account for Nvidia chips and AI infrastructure on their books. The controversy's getting heated, but honestly? Some critics might be pushing their arguments a bit too far this time.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichHuntervip
· 12-10 01:22
The ones selling shovels always make the most money; accounting issues are actually a minor matter.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingSeriousvip
· 12-09 02:54
How does chip accounting work? Simply put, it's just about depreciating more to pay less tax.
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHuntervip
· 12-08 14:54
Damn, accounting issues can cause this much controversy? Forget it, let's focus on algorithms. Sooner or later, assets will have to be redefined anyway.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBeanvip
· 12-08 14:54
Damn, is this accounting issue really that complicated? The standards should have been unified long ago.
View OriginalReply0
gm_or_ngmivip
· 12-08 14:47
Uh, no, is this accounting issue really that complicated? Can't we just throw money at it and buy the chips?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXMvip
· 12-08 14:27
Oh, some people really overcomplicate accounting issues. A chip is just a chip, how you handle it depends on your own situation. No need to make it into big news...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)