A common phenomenon in the community is that some KOLs are criticized mostly for bullying the weak and fearing the strong. Those troublemaker-level KOLs are rarely attacked, while newcomers or novice practitioners often become the targets.

Taking the Aster ecosystem as an example, you can see the huge differences among token holders. Some Aster holders (with holdings over $700,000) have been encouraging community members to continue holding, even when the exchange staff are not very friendly. This holder continues to provide positive guidance.

In contrast, holders of other tokens? Basically following pyramid scheme logic—first convincing you to willingly spend money to enter, then justifying it as "community building." Long-term holders' attitudes and the feelings of new entrants are worlds apart.

This actually reflects that: those who truly believe in the project's long-term development will support the community with actions, while highly speculative participants only create information noise. The quality of the ecosystem often depends on the caliber of core holders.