2026-01-08 23:00:30

By 2025, it has been verified that a leading public chain can operate stably under large-scale application scenarios.

Entering 2026, the focus should shift to another direction — not only maintaining this scalability but also making further progress in execution efficiency, transaction throughput, and system reliability. At the same time, a new public chain is being prepared to accommodate the explosive growth of on-chain applications in the next cycle.

In simple terms, it’s about upgrading from "able to run" to "run more stably and faster," while also opening a second front. The technical iterations, infrastructure optimizations, and ecosystem coordination involved are substantial. The entire industry is watching to see how this step will unfold.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasOptimizer

· 4h ago

Stability is fundamental, but throughput is the bottleneck. Historical data shows that once TPS increases, Gas fees can drop by over 30%, and arbitrage opportunities immediately emerge.

View OriginalReply0

gaslight_gasfeez

· 01-08 23:30

Stably running for a year, now it's time to race for speed --- New public chain launched, and it's another gas fee hell --- A year of promoting stability, the real test is just beginning --- Second chain? The ecosystem isn't fully built yet, and you're launching a new one? --- From being able to run to running fast, it sounds easy but actually very difficult --- The industry is watching, the pressure is immense --- Optimizing infrastructure will definitely take a long time again --- With the new public chain coming, it depends on how the ecosystem channels traffic --- Can throughput be increased and gas fees reduced? That's the key --- Running two chains in parallel, the technical team must be exhausted

View OriginalReply0

HodlKumamon

· 01-08 23:30

From being able to run to running steadily, I give this wave of technological iteration an 87% success probability. However, the new public chain part really has some gambling elements. That said, the dual-chain parallel approach hasn't been that successful historically... The data is here. The bear market is a bit anxious, but I still believe in them.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 01-08 23:23

Looking forward to it, but the key is still to implement it; just talking without action is useless. --- Don't mess up before the new chain goes live; that's what I'm most worried about. --- Doubling throughput? First lower the gas fees before bragging. --- The second battleground feels a bit rushed; can it be delivered on time? --- Finally, someone is seriously working on infrastructure; other public chains should learn from this. --- From being able to run to running stably, it sounds simple but is really difficult to do. --- It sounds good, but whether it can be stabilized is the real test. --- Another new chain? Can the market absorb it? Not afraid of repeated competition? --- What is the timeline for this wave of technological iteration? Is there a schedule? --- At least there's a clear direction now, much better than some slackers.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityLurker

· 01-08 23:22

Alright, it's that same spiel of "able to upgrade from running to running fast" again. How many times have I heard that? Can new public chains really create differentiation, or is it just another round of fundraising and harvesting? Let's wait and see the data at mid-year; right now, it's all expectations.

View OriginalReply0

0xSoulless

· 01-08 23:09

Is that all? Are you preparing to launch a new public chain and cut new investors again? It's good enough if it can run, but still want it to run steadily and quickly. Greedy, everyone. The second battleground... are you afraid the first one will crash, meaning you want to run away early?

View OriginalReply0