【CryptoWorld】The game of the US Congress over stablecoin reward policies is heating up. According to the latest reports, a leading compliant platform is increasing lobbying efforts in the US Congress in hopes of preserving the practice of issuing rewards to stablecoin holders. If the “Digital Asset Market Structure Act” continues to tighten restrictions on stablecoin rewards, it will directly impact the revenue models of platforms that rely on stablecoins like USDC.
The banking industry strongly opposes this, fearing that stablecoin rewards will divert traditional deposits. At its core, this dispute revolves around the regulatory classification of “whether stablecoins have deposit-like attributes.” Industry analysts believe that this classification will have far-reaching impacts on the business models of exchanges, wallets, and payment platforms.
If ultimately only licensed financial institutions are allowed to issue stablecoin rewards, industry concentration will further increase, and smaller platforms will face greater pressure. This means that the boundaries of compliance are becoming a key variable in platform competition. Those who can better understand and adapt to the new regulatory framework will hold the advantage in the next phase of competition.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Battle for Stablecoin Rewards Heats Up: How US Regulatory Battles Are Reshaping Exchange Business Models
【CryptoWorld】The game of the US Congress over stablecoin reward policies is heating up. According to the latest reports, a leading compliant platform is increasing lobbying efforts in the US Congress in hopes of preserving the practice of issuing rewards to stablecoin holders. If the “Digital Asset Market Structure Act” continues to tighten restrictions on stablecoin rewards, it will directly impact the revenue models of platforms that rely on stablecoins like USDC.
The banking industry strongly opposes this, fearing that stablecoin rewards will divert traditional deposits. At its core, this dispute revolves around the regulatory classification of “whether stablecoins have deposit-like attributes.” Industry analysts believe that this classification will have far-reaching impacts on the business models of exchanges, wallets, and payment platforms.
If ultimately only licensed financial institutions are allowed to issue stablecoin rewards, industry concentration will further increase, and smaller platforms will face greater pressure. This means that the boundaries of compliance are becoming a key variable in platform competition. Those who can better understand and adapt to the new regulatory framework will hold the advantage in the next phase of competition.