The market always follows this pattern: retail investors are bearish, while institutions and project teams only promote bullishness. The logic is simple—who would want to talk down their own work? How do they make a living if not by continuously attracting retail investors? As long as they shout about cyclical bull markets and eternal bulls, this narrative always seems to hold up. But in the end, retail accounts turn red, and the money is gone. Who should take responsibility for this? Essentially, it’s determined by information gaps and利益链条—different stances naturally lead to different rhetoric.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-40edb63b
· 6h ago
Wake up, everyone. This is the crypto circle ecosystem—it's always the little guys at the bottom.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 6h ago
A typical pump-and-dump scheme: once the institutions speak, retail investors are doomed.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 6h ago
Tired of hearing this, this set of rhetoric is repeated every bull market. The key is that retail investors just love to hear it, who can be blamed?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 6h ago
That's why I never trust those who shout "bull" every day; those who are truly making money have already shut up.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkeptic
· 6h ago
Ah, here we go again with that old trick, retail investors are always the last to get stuck holding the bag.
The market always follows this pattern: retail investors are bearish, while institutions and project teams only promote bullishness. The logic is simple—who would want to talk down their own work? How do they make a living if not by continuously attracting retail investors? As long as they shout about cyclical bull markets and eternal bulls, this narrative always seems to hold up. But in the end, retail accounts turn red, and the money is gone. Who should take responsibility for this? Essentially, it’s determined by information gaps and利益链条—different stances naturally lead to different rhetoric.