A recent phenomenon worth noting in this rebound is that the contract funding for BTC and ETH is rapidly selling off, and after funds exit, the market quickly pulls back. Even before the price rises, the funding side remains predominantly bearish, indicating that there is no real incremental capital stepping in.
The operational logic at this point becomes clearer. If on-chain data monitoring reveals that large funds are continuously fleeing, then taking profits and shorting becomes the optimal defensive strategy; but if the funds fluctuate without signs of large-scale exit, then it’s better to hold the position and wait for a bigger market move. The key is to learn to distinguish between these two situations—whether the funds are truly fleeing or just experiencing short-term technical oscillations. Regularly checking the actual data of the contract funding will make these judgments more accurate.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
just_another_fish
· 5h ago
The funds are really moving out, this rebound feels very fake.
The volume on the contract side can't hold up at all, it's better to focus on on-chain data for reliability.
Basically, it's about whether the big players are truly withdrawing or just shaking out the market; getting it wrong means losing out.
This time, I chose to sell half first and wait patiently, and see what the signals indicate.
Always shouting about the bottom, but it's still just a game of harvesting the little guys, so annoying.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 5h ago
It's another game of capital flow tricks. Theoretically, it should work, but in practice, it's full of pitfalls. I'll try out this intelligent monitoring logic first... and I ended up locking myself inside again.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 5h ago
It's the same old story... The funding data has been manipulated for a long time, constantly shouting to exit, exit, but it still continues to rise. Can your quantitative model make money?
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 6h ago
ngl the liquidity fingerprints don't lie here... whale exodus pattern confirmed statistically significant. this isn't noise, it's behavioral data screaming "accumulation phase hasn't started yet"
A recent phenomenon worth noting in this rebound is that the contract funding for BTC and ETH is rapidly selling off, and after funds exit, the market quickly pulls back. Even before the price rises, the funding side remains predominantly bearish, indicating that there is no real incremental capital stepping in.
The operational logic at this point becomes clearer. If on-chain data monitoring reveals that large funds are continuously fleeing, then taking profits and shorting becomes the optimal defensive strategy; but if the funds fluctuate without signs of large-scale exit, then it’s better to hold the position and wait for a bigger market move. The key is to learn to distinguish between these two situations—whether the funds are truly fleeing or just experiencing short-term technical oscillations. Regularly checking the actual data of the contract funding will make these judgments more accurate.