Recently, market enthusiasm has clearly increased, but upon observation, many people are still repeating the old routine of manual chasing and selling. To be honest, the current on-chain ecosystem makes pure manual operations too costly—one misstep can easily lead to being swept out during price fluctuations.
Instead of relying on human judgment, it's better to let tools serve you. What is the truly efficient approach to new token launches? Simply two points: first, obtaining accurate market signals; second, being able to automatically follow and execute trades.
Take AI signals as an example. The trigger points are often very precisely set, with some platforms' early warnings even accurate down to low levels like 35k. This not only means better entry costs but also, more importantly, reaction speed that humans simply can't match. Once a signal appears, an automated system can instantly capture it—no need to wait for human response, no worries about reaction speed.
This is why more and more experienced traders are starting to rely on such tools: reducing human interference, letting data and algorithms speak, which is key to surviving in today's market competition.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
not_your_keys
· 5h ago
Manual chasing gains and cutting losses is really competitive, but to be honest, AI signals are not a silver bullet either. The key still depends on your own judgment.
I agree that automated systems respond quickly, but the problem is who ensures that the algorithm itself is problem-free.
Listening to 35k bottom-fishing sounds great, but can backtesting and live trading be the same? It always feels like these kinds of promotions are a bit over the top.
Instead of relying on tools, it's better to first solidify your basic skills.
Come on, come on, whether to buy new issues still depends on luck; tools are just aids.
Has anyone used these kinds of platforms? Won't they run away with the funds?
Auto copy trading sounds comfortable, but what about the fees? After deducting them, how many points are left?
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 5h ago
Automated copy trading sounds great, but what about the moment of real execution? Do you consider slippage? What are the fees? Have you calculated them?
Machines are fast, no doubt, but the harshest reality in the market is never reaction speed—it's black swan events.
It's easy to say, isn't it? Isn't this just a disguised sales pitch?
35k precise alerts—give me a break. Historical backtesting and live trading are two completely different things.
There is no such thing as absolute reliance on tools; it's all a game of probabilities. Don't be brainwashed by the seller's stories.
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 5h ago
Automated copy trading sounds good, but how many can truly achieve stable profits? Most are still getting cut.
That kind of low-point signal at 35k—believe it or not, I haven't encountered it.
By the way, is manual trading really that bad? The real issue is still people's mindset.
No matter how powerful the tools are, you have to know how to use them; otherwise, you'll lose even faster.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 6h ago
Starting to sell tools again, but to be honest, manual operation is really exhausting. Often, slow reactions get you eliminated.
Are the algorithms reliable? It feels like the accuracy at 35k is a bit questionable.
Still, I have to try myself. Anyway, the losses are my own business.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFiller
· 6h ago
Watching people chase gains and sell off at a loss, losing everything, and still refusing to use tools, really deserved it.
Automation is indeed great, but it also depends on whether the platform is reliable.
35k precise warning? That number sounds a bit suspicious, please provide solid proof.
Recently, market enthusiasm has clearly increased, but upon observation, many people are still repeating the old routine of manual chasing and selling. To be honest, the current on-chain ecosystem makes pure manual operations too costly—one misstep can easily lead to being swept out during price fluctuations.
Instead of relying on human judgment, it's better to let tools serve you. What is the truly efficient approach to new token launches? Simply two points: first, obtaining accurate market signals; second, being able to automatically follow and execute trades.
Take AI signals as an example. The trigger points are often very precisely set, with some platforms' early warnings even accurate down to low levels like 35k. This not only means better entry costs but also, more importantly, reaction speed that humans simply can't match. Once a signal appears, an automated system can instantly capture it—no need to wait for human response, no worries about reaction speed.
This is why more and more experienced traders are starting to rely on such tools: reducing human interference, letting data and algorithms speak, which is key to surviving in today's market competition.