The Lighter project essentially embodies the core logic of shorting Hyperliquid—issues like farm token models and unsustainable revenue sources. Interestingly, there are voices in the market supporting Hyperliquid, and as a result, this wave of popularity has actually boosted Lighter's visibility, with many participants jumping in to mine in a follow-the-leader fashion. This reflects a phenomenon: opposing project evaluations often generate mutual traffic, and the pursuit behavior of capital and users can sometimes resemble a reverse conspiracy.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TheMemefather
· 1h ago
Farm coin is the number one in harvesting profits; both sides praise each other and the price keeps rising. This deal is absolutely brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumper
· 1h ago
Damn, this is exactly what I was talking about—two projects riding each other's coattails, and retail investors get completely wrecked
---
Aren't farm coins all like this? Early crazy mining, then they go to zero later. Lighter and Hyperliquid use the same套路
---
Reverse collusion, well said. Capital earns traffic, users get the thrill of getting wrecked, a perfect closed loop
---
By the way, does anyone really believe these projects can sustain profits? I don't believe it anyway
---
Is that all? I thought Lighter could come up with something new, but it's still the same old tokenomics
---
Capital and users mutually achieve each other—you're wrecking me, I'm wrecking you, everyone’s happy
---
Hmm... so now everyone entering Lighter is betting that this wave of hype can be pumped up a bit longer
---
Creating traffic through opposing viewpoints—this move is indeed brilliant, full marks for marketing
---
Feels like this is the only trick in the crypto world, I'm tired of it
---
Wait, isn't the voice supporting Hyperliquid actually the puppet master behind Lighter? Think about it carefully, it's chilling
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 1h ago
This trick is really clever; stepping on each other actually makes both sides popular—a double act of harvesting the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropworkerZhang
· 2h ago
This strategy is all about mutual blood transfusion; winning or losing doesn't matter. Anyway, we're really making a profit from mining.
The Lighter project essentially embodies the core logic of shorting Hyperliquid—issues like farm token models and unsustainable revenue sources. Interestingly, there are voices in the market supporting Hyperliquid, and as a result, this wave of popularity has actually boosted Lighter's visibility, with many participants jumping in to mine in a follow-the-leader fashion. This reflects a phenomenon: opposing project evaluations often generate mutual traffic, and the pursuit behavior of capital and users can sometimes resemble a reverse conspiracy.