Remember when Bitcoin was sitting at $125k and ETFs started pumping in cash? That's the thing—massive inflows usually signal we're near a top, while big outflows tend to catch the bottoms. It's all about the money flow and what it tells you about where we actually are in the cycle.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvester
· 5h ago
Speaking of 125k, that move was indeed a bit outrageous. The influx of institutional money came in too aggressively, which actually made me a bit nervous.
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 5h ago
That time with 125k, I really didn't have the courage to go all in. Now I regret it to death, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTradingGuru
· 5h ago
Whoa, this theory sounds so familiar to me... Does reverse operation really make money?
View OriginalReply0
MEVVictimAlliance
· 5h ago
Wow, this logic is reversed. The influx of people can also be a signal of the beginning.
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeow
· 5h ago
Back when it was 125k, I was already thinking about this. Large capital inflows are really a top signal. Looking back now, it's ridiculous.
Remember when Bitcoin was sitting at $125k and ETFs started pumping in cash? That's the thing—massive inflows usually signal we're near a top, while big outflows tend to catch the bottoms. It's all about the money flow and what it tells you about where we actually are in the cycle.