Recently, I had an experience I want to share: through Web3, I connected with many international creators and project teams, and I wanted to send them some appreciation funds. However, I encountered an awkward privacy dilemma.
If I use a traditional banking app to transfer money, it seems more private, but transaction records and balances can easily be linked and tracked. On the other hand, if I use an on-chain wallet, the problem is the opposite—transfer amounts and remaining balances can be seen on a block explorer, making the entire financial situation almost transparent.
It's like choosing between two extremes: being watched by the app backend or being exposed to the entire internet. Sometimes, you just want to send a small amount to show gratitude, but you have to weigh privacy against convenience and anonymity. This also explains why mixers, privacy coins, and Layer2 privacy solutions have always been hot topics in Web3—users indeed need a more balanced solution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PrivacyMaximalist
· 7h ago
Really, this is the magic of Web3. Even trying to move money discreetly is so difficult.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 7h ago
This is just outrageous. Banks are afraid of being watched, on-chain is afraid of being seen, and being caught in the middle is really uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
CommunitySlacker
· 7h ago
Haha, I told you, this is the most genuine embarrassment in Web3.
Either I get exposed by bank dad, or the whole internet knows about my few coins—truly caught between a rock and a hard place.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyer
· 7h ago
Isn't this just a deadlock? Everything on the chain is transparent, and off-chain is monitored. It feels like no matter what you choose, you're always under scrutiny.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 7h ago
actually, let me pull up my spreadsheet here—you're presenting a false binary which is taxonomically incorrect. traditional rails have sophisticated graph analysis; on-chain you're just... voluntarily broadcasting. data suggests otherwise on the "privacy" front lol
Recently, I had an experience I want to share: through Web3, I connected with many international creators and project teams, and I wanted to send them some appreciation funds. However, I encountered an awkward privacy dilemma.
If I use a traditional banking app to transfer money, it seems more private, but transaction records and balances can easily be linked and tracked. On the other hand, if I use an on-chain wallet, the problem is the opposite—transfer amounts and remaining balances can be seen on a block explorer, making the entire financial situation almost transparent.
It's like choosing between two extremes: being watched by the app backend or being exposed to the entire internet. Sometimes, you just want to send a small amount to show gratitude, but you have to weigh privacy against convenience and anonymity. This also explains why mixers, privacy coins, and Layer2 privacy solutions have always been hot topics in Web3—users indeed need a more balanced solution.