Why does one token sit at 25 million in market cap while another reaches 200 million? The answer often comes down to one critical factor: how the supply is managed.
One of the biggest mistakes in tokenomics is allowing too many small holders to own significant portions of the total supply. When that happens, you're looking at constant selling pressure, fragmented ownership with no real consensus, and endless sideways price action. Instead of unified direction, you get chaos—thousands of retail participants each making independent decisions, leading to perpetual chop and frustration.
Projects that maintain tighter supply structures tend to show different price dynamics. Concentration breeds coordination; distribution breeds noise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 17h ago
Basically, it's a concentration issue among major players. With more retail investors, it just stays sideways every day, which is boring.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 01-13 11:54
ngl That's why retail investors are always the ones getting cut; projects with poor supply management just fade away.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguy
· 01-13 11:50
Basically, the big players want to concentrate their chips, and the more retail investors there are, the more chaotic it gets.
View OriginalReply0
FlatTax
· 01-13 11:43
Basically, when there are too many retail investors, the project has to fail. I've understood this long ago.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 01-13 11:37
ngl That's why retail investors always get cut; projects with concentrated supply are indeed easier to pump.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon
· 01-13 11:33
Wow, so this is the truth about retail investors getting cut off. It's not that the coin isn't good enough, it's that too many people are holding it.
Why does one token sit at 25 million in market cap while another reaches 200 million? The answer often comes down to one critical factor: how the supply is managed.
One of the biggest mistakes in tokenomics is allowing too many small holders to own significant portions of the total supply. When that happens, you're looking at constant selling pressure, fragmented ownership with no real consensus, and endless sideways price action. Instead of unified direction, you get chaos—thousands of retail participants each making independent decisions, leading to perpetual chop and frustration.
Projects that maintain tighter supply structures tend to show different price dynamics. Concentration breeds coordination; distribution breeds noise.