Here's the reality: after correcting numerous eligible wallets, the outcome for OTC participants becomes starkly divided. Those holding aligned deals have decent odds of success, but here's the catch—participants aiming to sell face significantly higher loss potential.
The escrow mechanism matters here. It won't return funds to the seller. Instead, money flows to whoever initiated the buy side of the trade. That's how the system works. You're either on the winning side or you're not, and the rules favor the buyer's position.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasBankrupter
· 7h ago
Sellers are really being squeezed to death; this mechanism is just one-sidedly favoring the buyer.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 7h ago
Is it the same old story? Buyers are making a killing, sellers are losing heavily, the escrow mechanism is just one-sided.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 7h ago
Sellers always lose money, this escrow mechanism is outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 8h ago
It's the old trick of the buyer winning everything again... Sellers really have the "bagholder" mentality.
Here's the reality: after correcting numerous eligible wallets, the outcome for OTC participants becomes starkly divided. Those holding aligned deals have decent odds of success, but here's the catch—participants aiming to sell face significantly higher loss potential.
The escrow mechanism matters here. It won't return funds to the seller. Instead, money flows to whoever initiated the buy side of the trade. That's how the system works. You're either on the winning side or you're not, and the rules favor the buyer's position.