2026-01-14 08:12:00

Take a look at the trend of Happy-SCI, many people's positions have significantly shrunk in the short term. The underlying logic is quite straightforward—these types of projects are characterized by high control and extremely limited liquidity. Coupled with the release of certain key information, it is very likely that the team behind the project has decided the pace of withdrawal, which is why such a sharp decline occurs.

Similar situations are not uncommon in the market. There is a project whose trend is almost identical to Happy-SCI, also controlled by a few large holders, with sluggish trading volume and extremely fragile market conditions. As soon as a signal appears, the chips start to loosen, and the final outcome is often such a sharp plunge.

This reminds us that participating in projects with high control and low liquidity requires extra caution. Liquidity risk is often more dangerous than you might imagine.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoWageSlave

· 8h ago

It's another manipulated coin; you should have avoided the trap long ago. Things like Happy-SCI with low liquidity are ticking time bombs in the hands of big players—who's to blame? Who did they cut this time? If liquidity is poor, just don't touch it. Everyone understands the reasoning, but greed gets the better of us.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 8h ago

It's the same old trick, it's getting boring to watch. I already said not to touch these air coins, but some people still keep throwing money into them. When the big players pull out, retail investors get hammered. It's time to learn to be smart about this.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-1a2ed0b9

· 8h ago

It's the same old trick, I've seen through it long ago. Happy-SCI should have run long ago; with such poor liquidity, who would dare to take over? I've advised others not to touch these kinds of trash coins long ago, but some still got trapped. The way the manipulators cut the leeks is becoming more and more skilled. Projects with low liquidity should really be avoided; it's too easy to be repeatedly shaken out. I'm just surprised, how can there still be people rushing in with such obvious warning signals? Once the liquidity of a coin with poor liquidity is dumped, it completely can't be stopped. Someone is going to suffer heavy losses this time.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropATM

· 9h ago

It's the same old trick; I've seen through it long ago.

View OriginalReply0

MysteryBoxBuster

· 9h ago

Is it the same old story? I've seen through it long ago. Low-liquidity projects are just hidden mines; the moment the whales pull out is your death sentence.

View OriginalReply0