Can't pinpoint the exact valuation from the latest funding round, but based on current metrics, that 6k-19k range looks conservative. If this token hits a 1 billion market cap, we'd be looking at roughly double from those levels. The math checks out if adoption accelerates.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhobia
· 11h ago
6k to 19k is indeed underestimated; the real issue is whether the adoption rate can truly keep up... In plain terms, it's a gamble on growth.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 11h ago
Forget it, whether a 1 billion market cap doubles depends on how adoption progresses. It feels like this funding round is holding back some numbers.
View OriginalReply0
TokenEconomist
· 11h ago
actually, let me break this down — the key variable here is adoption velocity, which traditionally follows an s-curve in network economics. but tbh the 1B market cap assumption feels like ceteris paribus thinking without factoring in dilution mechanics. where's the protocol emissions decay curve in this thesis?
Reply0
shadowy_supercoder
· 11h ago
Hmm, these numbers seem a bit conservative... If it really hits a market cap of 1 billion, doubling isn't too much, right?
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 11h ago
Conservative? Well, I want to see how much it can actually rise to😏
Can't pinpoint the exact valuation from the latest funding round, but based on current metrics, that 6k-19k range looks conservative. If this token hits a 1 billion market cap, we'd be looking at roughly double from those levels. The math checks out if adoption accelerates.