【BlockBeats】Recently, there have been new developments in the Senate Banking Committee— the scheduled revision hearing for the “CLARITY Act” (Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act) this Thursday has been temporarily canceled.
The story behind it is quite interesting. After a 278-page amendment was released, the industry responded strongly. A leading exchange was the first to withdraw support for the draft, and industry complaints quickly exploded. What is everyone’s main dissatisfaction? During the revision process, legislators made too many concessions to banks and traditional financial institutions. Especially on key issues like stablecoin yields and tokenization, the crypto community feels they have been compromised.
Some openly say that the “CLARITY Act” was already biased towards traditional institutions in its structure, and the recent revision has only made things worse. The Democratic side is also not idle; they insist on adding ethical standards clauses to the draft, requiring high-level government officials, including the President, to refrain from profiting from crypto projects. This clause has been stuck at the White House several times, with both sides holding different views.
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott later issued a statement saying, “Everyone is still working seriously at the negotiation table,” but he did not specify when the hearing will be rescheduled. The Senate will be on holiday next week for Memorial Day and will reconvene the following week. By then, the Senate Agriculture Committee is also expected to hold a hearing, which has been moved from Thursday to later.
It seems that the process of amending this bill is far from over.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeCurator
· 15h ago
Are you compromising again? These people really only know how to kneel to traditional finance. What about our stablecoin yields? What about tokenization? It’s like they’re just playing around.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 16h ago
Coming back with this again? 278 pages of revisions are just to please Wall Street, huh?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologist
· 16h ago
It's the same old trick again, traditional finance takes the meat, and we drink the soup. The 278-page document has been completely rewritten; what do you even call this a bill?
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStriker
· 16h ago
It's the same old trick again, traditional finance takes the meat while we drink the soup? The 278-page garbage draft is not even written for us.
---
The postponement of the hearing is actually a good thing. Quickly withdraw support and don't let this broken bill pass.
---
Stablecoin yields have been cut, and tokenization is not spared. Is this what they call "friendly regulation"? Laughable.
---
The leading exchanges have finally woken up. What about the others? Stop just forwarding discussions.
---
Democrats adding moral clauses? I want to see if they are also so "moral" about Wall Street.
---
Wait, why continue to make changes after the hearing was canceled? Are they playing us?
---
Traditional finance is gradually encroaching. Is the cost of compromise the future of the entire industry? Is it worth it?
---
I just want to know when those exchanges that originally supported will finally stand firm.
The U.S. Senate postpones the CLARITY Act hearing, and the industry is dissatisfied with concessions to traditional finance.
【BlockBeats】Recently, there have been new developments in the Senate Banking Committee— the scheduled revision hearing for the “CLARITY Act” (Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act) this Thursday has been temporarily canceled.
The story behind it is quite interesting. After a 278-page amendment was released, the industry responded strongly. A leading exchange was the first to withdraw support for the draft, and industry complaints quickly exploded. What is everyone’s main dissatisfaction? During the revision process, legislators made too many concessions to banks and traditional financial institutions. Especially on key issues like stablecoin yields and tokenization, the crypto community feels they have been compromised.
Some openly say that the “CLARITY Act” was already biased towards traditional institutions in its structure, and the recent revision has only made things worse. The Democratic side is also not idle; they insist on adding ethical standards clauses to the draft, requiring high-level government officials, including the President, to refrain from profiting from crypto projects. This clause has been stuck at the White House several times, with both sides holding different views.
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott later issued a statement saying, “Everyone is still working seriously at the negotiation table,” but he did not specify when the hearing will be rescheduled. The Senate will be on holiday next week for Memorial Day and will reconvene the following week. By then, the Senate Agriculture Committee is also expected to hold a hearing, which has been moved from Thursday to later.
It seems that the process of amending this bill is far from over.