Decentralized storage sounds great, but in practice, there's always a tough challenge—how to enable ordinary people to participate while ensuring the network doesn't break down?



The Walrus Protocol project offers its answer: instead of making all nodes do the same work, why not differentiate based on capabilities?

**Clearly Defined Node Roles**

They divide nodes into several tiers. Storage nodes are the "laborers," responsible for storing data and providing retrieval, staking $WAL as collateral. Validator nodes and gateway nodes are higher-level roles, tasked with aggregating storage proofs, handling user requests, and providing cache acceleration. These roles have stricter hardware and network requirements, higher staking, and naturally, higher rewards.

The obvious benefit is that those with mining rigs can serve as storage nodes, while server clusters can compete as validator nodes—each doing what they’re best at. This increases overall network participation.

**Quality Is the Only Hard Currency**

But role division alone isn't enough. The network acts like a strict evaluator, continuously monitoring each node: uptime stability, retrieval speed, data integrity. Well-performing nodes earn bonus rewards, while offline or lazy nodes have their stakes penalized or confiscated.

This isn't just about "doing work and getting paid," but "doing good work to get paid." No matter how many nodes there are, what matters is how stable and fast the service they provide is.

**Community Decides Parameters**

Interestingly, core parameters like how much to stake, how rewards are distributed, and the storage fee rate are not decided by a single team behind closed doors. Instead, $WAL holders vote via DAO to determine these settings. The advantage is that the network can evolve itself—adjusting parameters with technological progress, market changes, and incentive flexibility—without being stuck by a single decision.

In essence, Walrus aims to build not just another pseudo-decentralized project, but a truly global distributed storage infrastructure where thousands of high-quality nodes participate voluntarily and self-regulate. If this model can truly take off, its competitiveness will be formidable.
WAL-1,23%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DogeBachelorvip
· 11h ago
The division of labor sounds good, but I'm worried it will just become another trick of "appearing decentralized while actually centralized."
View OriginalReply0
BetterLuckyThanSmartvip
· 11h ago
Division of labor + quality scoring, this logic is indeed much more reliable than "everyone is equal." The key still lies in the DAO voting system; being immune to team deadlock is true decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 12h ago
Layered design is indeed clever, but to put it nicely, it's about division of labor; to be blunt, it's about retail investors running errands while big players make money, right? The higher the staking, the more you earn—it's still a game of capital.
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapistvip
· 12h ago
The layered mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether it can truly motivate retail investors. How much staking is needed to participate? Has the threshold for ordinary people been calculated?
View OriginalReply0
StableGeniusDegenvip
· 12h ago
The layered node system is indeed clear, but the real question is how many can truly support it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)