Some Layer 1 projects have maintained impressive uptime records since launch. Movement, IOTA, and Supra Labs have all achieved zero downtime operational records. Meanwhile, other protocols like Aptos have had to release bug fixes and patches to maintain stability. It raises interesting questions about the differences in technical architecture and operational reliability across the ecosystem. Which approach to infrastructure design delivers better long-term sustainability?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BanklessAtHeart
· 11h ago
Zero downtime sounds great, but when it comes to production environment, it all depends on the data. Stability alone without throughput is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 11h ago
Zero downtime sounds unbelievable. Are these projects real or is it just that no one uses them, so there's no traffic to push out?
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 11h ago
Zero downtime? Keep dreaming. Want to try on the mainnet?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 12h ago
Zero downtime sounds impressive, but can it really be used, or is it just hype?
Some Layer 1 projects have maintained impressive uptime records since launch. Movement, IOTA, and Supra Labs have all achieved zero downtime operational records. Meanwhile, other protocols like Aptos have had to release bug fixes and patches to maintain stability. It raises interesting questions about the differences in technical architecture and operational reliability across the ecosystem. Which approach to infrastructure design delivers better long-term sustainability?