2026-01-15 13:21:43

A few days ago, there was an interesting news story: a leading asset management firm launched the first tokenization plan for Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLO) — the CLO 2025-1 project. It sounds very professional, but the core logic is actually just moving traditional financial products onto the blockchain.

The issuance scale is $75 million, with one investor directly investing $50 million in the underlying assets, showing a strong level of confidence. The debt tranching is issued on the Avalanche chain, and the tokens are subsequently listed on a compliant platform, mainly for qualified investors to trade.

There is a bigger story behind this — it is just one part of an investment institution’s strategy to deploy $250 million in tokenized real-world assets (RWA) on the Avalanche ecosystem. From traditional loan bonds to blockchain-native finance, this trend is becoming increasingly evident. Although still a niche market, this innovative approach is changing the liquidity and accessibility of traditional assets.

AVAX-6,24%

RWA11,43%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainSniper

· 5h ago

Here comes another round of traditional finance leeching, this time directly on the chain Is RWA really about to take off? Feels like it's still institutions having fun by themselves 50 million all in, either bullish or there's insider info haha Avalanche ecosystem has indeed been bloodsucking over the past two years Wait, does this thing really have better liquidity than traditional markets? I'm a bit skeptical The figure of 2.5 billion is scary, but it's still a small market in reality Tokenized bonds... sounds safe, but what about the risks? Just listing on a compliant platform is enough? The threshold is super high Isn't this just traditional finance with a new coat? The essence hasn't changed Avalanche is playing big, other chains should be worried

View OriginalReply0

failed_dev_successful_ape

· 5h ago

Isn't this just traditional finance's complicated tricks wrapped in a new package and put on the blockchain? Can it really work? --- 50 million directly invested... Are you guys really optimistic or just gambling? --- RWA is getting more and more popular, but the underlying logic is still the same. --- Wait, can you trade just by listing on a compliant platform? It still feels a bit vague in terms of regulation. --- The niche market is now only 250 million, and if this trend continues, it will really take off. --- I just want to ask, what if the CLO tokens really run away with the money... --- Avalanche is back to ride the hype; this chain has been quite prominent recently. --- It sounds like traditional financial "DingTalk to DingTalk" operations. What's changing? --- No hype, no blackening, it has indeed changed asset liquidity, but who bears the risk? --- Qualified investors... same old story, retail investors still have no chance.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTrapper

· 5h ago

so they're literally just wrapping boomer debt in smart contracts and calling it innovation lol... actually if you read the contract, that $50m anchor investor move screams "we need exit liquidity" 🚩

Reply0

SelfRugger

· 5h ago

Another new approach to RWA, but this time throwing 50 million is indeed a bit aggressive. TradFi rushing into blockchain is no longer news; it depends on whether the Avalanche chain can hold up. Wait, is a 75 million scale really considered niche? It still feels like playing around. CLO tokenization? Basically, it's just slicing up debt for secondary sales. Creativity is one thing, but what about the risks? The $250 million strategic plan for the Avalanche ecosystem sounds impressive, but how much of it can actually be implemented is hard to say. Is this what they call financial innovation? It doesn't seem to have much of an essential difference. As long as it's labeled "compliance," the industry starts to compete internally. Where is the true permissionless spirit?

View OriginalReply0