Holding ARB for a period of time and accumulating a significant position through monthly airdrops. After comparing with other mainstream tokens in the L2 ecosystem, I realized that ARB's tokenomics design has obvious shortcomings.
In comparison, POL's staking model is relatively more complete—there are not only basic staking rewards but also relatively stable token airdrops from ecosystem blue-chip projects. More importantly, its deflationary logic is comprehensive: full gas fee burn + staking rewards + cross-chain fee flows, creating a continuous deflationary effect at the million-level scale.
Although SUI and APTOS are smaller in size, both have basic staking rewards and gas rebate mechanisms, making their token economic cycle relatively coherent. In contrast, ARB's reward model design indeed appears somewhat thin. From ecosystem layout to overall token supply incentives, there is still considerable room for optimization.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleWatcher
· 11h ago
The tokenomics design of arb is really a bit awkward... Relying solely on airdrops to build a position doesn't really mean much.
Pol's deflationary logic is excellent—burning millions of tokens continuously, now that's a real strategy.
If arb doesn't start thinking about optimization, it will really fall behind.
View OriginalReply0
ContractHunter
· 11h ago
This design of arb is really disappointing, far worse compared to pol.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 11h ago
Damn, the tokenomics design of ARB is really disappointing, POL's deflation logic is outstanding...
ARB airdropped for so long for free, but no staking rewards, and now we have to watch POL and SUI show off their moves, it's a bit awkward.
ARB needs to be rectified quickly, or how can it compare to Polygon?
Honestly, holding ARB is not as good as stacking POL, the difference is too obvious.
The ARB team really needs to seriously reflect on their tokenomics.
Gas burning + staking + cross-chain fees, this combo POL executes really well.
How did ARB end up like this? A bit disappointing...
SUI and APTOS may be small in scale, but their token economic cycle is actually more refined than ARB?
Wait, has ARB always lacked a proper staking mechanism?
POL's engine burns through a million in deflation, ARB really should learn from that.
The optimization space for ARB is so big, it feels like the official team is slacking off.
If we keep comparing like this, just having ecosystem traffic isn't enough; the token model is the real Achilles' heel.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeLover
· 11h ago
This arb design is really disappointing. Relying solely on airdrops to boost the scene isn't enough. Just look at POI's deflationary combo and you'll see the gap.
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 11h ago
ARB's design is indeed disappointing; airdrops are enjoyable, but in the long run, fundamentals matter. POL's deflationary logic is really clever.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 11h ago
ARB's design is indeed a bit disappointing; after such a long airdrop, there's still no significant staking rewards. POL's deflationary logic is excellent.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizard
· 11h ago
honestly arb's tokenomics are giving "we'll figure it out later" energy... pol's deflationary loop actually makes mathematical sense whereas arb's just sitting there collecting dust in wallets lol
Holding ARB for a period of time and accumulating a significant position through monthly airdrops. After comparing with other mainstream tokens in the L2 ecosystem, I realized that ARB's tokenomics design has obvious shortcomings.
In comparison, POL's staking model is relatively more complete—there are not only basic staking rewards but also relatively stable token airdrops from ecosystem blue-chip projects. More importantly, its deflationary logic is comprehensive: full gas fee burn + staking rewards + cross-chain fee flows, creating a continuous deflationary effect at the million-level scale.
Although SUI and APTOS are smaller in size, both have basic staking rewards and gas rebate mechanisms, making their token economic cycle relatively coherent. In contrast, ARB's reward model design indeed appears somewhat thin. From ecosystem layout to overall token supply incentives, there is still considerable room for optimization.