Perpetual trading platforms have actually been quite resistant for me for a while.
Honestly, I've experienced too many times — you honestly participate in liquidity mining, engage in interactions, contribute to pool depth, and then when settlement day comes, the platform changes the rules — either cutting the weight in half or just saying "Detected abnormal behavior" and zeroing out your earnings. That feeling isn't just losing money; it's feeling like you're being used as a tool, with rules always on their side.
Later, my mindset changed a bit. I started to seriously explore some different platforms and found that some projects' mechanism designs are indeed more transparent. For example, publicly disclosed rule logic beforehand, stable reward weights without arbitrary adjustments, and clearer standards for defining abnormal behavior — these seemingly simple things can actually help users avoid many pitfalls.
Looking back now, when choosing a platform, instead of chasing high returns, it's better to first understand their risk control logic and rule stability. That’s the foundation for long-term participation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AltcoinMarathoner
· 01-15 13:51
just like mile 20 of a marathon, these rule changes hit different—you're exhausted but the finish line's still miles away. transparency in mechanics > chasing yields, always.
Reply0
YieldChaser
· 01-15 13:50
Only after being scammed multiple times do you realize that high returns don't matter much; the key is whether the platform might suddenly turn hostile.
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 01-15 13:49
Once wiped out, it's truly over.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 01-15 13:49
Really, once you've been scammed and are afraid, you'll start to pick platforms.
View OriginalReply0
WenMoon
· 01-15 13:44
To be honest, I'm really annoyed on your behalf seeing what you've gone through. That kind of trick is truly disgusting.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 01-15 13:36
It's so realistic. Being afraid of being cut definitely makes you resistant.
Perpetual trading platforms have actually been quite resistant for me for a while.
Honestly, I've experienced too many times — you honestly participate in liquidity mining, engage in interactions, contribute to pool depth, and then when settlement day comes, the platform changes the rules — either cutting the weight in half or just saying "Detected abnormal behavior" and zeroing out your earnings. That feeling isn't just losing money; it's feeling like you're being used as a tool, with rules always on their side.
Later, my mindset changed a bit. I started to seriously explore some different platforms and found that some projects' mechanism designs are indeed more transparent. For example, publicly disclosed rule logic beforehand, stable reward weights without arbitrary adjustments, and clearer standards for defining abnormal behavior — these seemingly simple things can actually help users avoid many pitfalls.
Looking back now, when choosing a platform, instead of chasing high returns, it's better to first understand their risk control logic and rule stability. That’s the foundation for long-term participation.