RWA (Real World Assets) has recently become a hot topic, but few people truly see a fundamental contradiction: financial institutions need blockchain transparency but must also safeguard customer privacy.



Dusk has found its niche in this gap. It is not the traditional privacy coin that pursues absolute anonymity, but instead achieves "controllable compliant privacy" through zero-knowledge proof technology — satisfying regulatory requirements while protecting user privacy. This balance is highly valuable for institutional-level applications.

From a technical perspective, Dusk's competitiveness should not be underestimated. Its self-developed Piecrust virtual machine and micro-node architecture enable privacy verification to be completed on ordinary consumer-grade hardware or even smartphones. In today's crowded ZK track, this lightweight solution indeed has some uniqueness.

However, it is also important to recognize its dual nature. Pursuing "deep compliance" means the upper limit is becoming an infrastructure for institutional entry, but there are also risks at the lower end — it may face skepticism from pure cryptography purists, as some regard "full decentralization and anonymity" as a belief.

On the eve of the RWA explosion, infrastructure projects like Dusk with compliance genes are indeed worth paying attention to. But at the same time, it is necessary to monitor the speed of its technological implementation and the actual adoption by institutions, as these two factors ultimately determine its ceiling.
DUSK-4,75%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 5h ago
let me pull up my spreadsheet on this one... dusk's compliance-first positioning is taxonomically interesting but data suggests institutional adoption timelines are glacial at best. the piecrust vm is neat hardware optimization, but ngl the "controlled privacy" framing feels like regulatory theater. real question is whether they can actually outpace zk competitors before this gets priced in
Reply0
rugpull_ptsdvip
· 5h ago
Compliance and privacy sound sexy, but can they really be implemented? I've seen too many "revolutionary solutions" end up as just PPTs.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtistvip
· 5h ago
High-level bag holder, looking at Dusk's ZK technology now, the MACD hasn't yet formed a golden cross. This wave of compliant privacy sounds good, but the actual implementation speed is the decisive factor... I'm just worried it might turn out to be another story coin. If institutional adoption progress can't keep up, the ceiling is indeed concerning.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiaryvip
· 5h ago
To be honest, the compliance and privacy logic sounds good, but will institutions really buy into it? It still seems to depend on implementation.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)