There is a piece of data worth paying attention to—AI computing power consumption in the US has already accounted for 7% of the country's total electricity generation. This proportion may not seem large, but upon deeper reflection, being just one step away from 8% makes it significant.
What’s even more concerning is that the value generated by this electricity consumption has become a question mark. Let’s see what 8% really means: it’s roughly equivalent to three times 2.714%. In other words, the demand for AI computing power in the US is consuming the natural growth rate of the country’s three major pillar industries.
This is the real issue. Once the power consumption for computing exceeds 8% and still fails to produce genuine value, the entire logic of AI computing power will be challenged. Because this is akin to mobilizing the entire nation’s effort to force the growth dividends of the three major industries into the AI basket, only to find it’s like drawing water with a bamboo basket—value has nowhere to go.
Of course, to continue boosting stock prices, some capital may keep stacking computing power and expanding electricity consumption. But there is a strict rule: 33.33% of the total US electricity capacity is the ceiling. Once this line is crossed, the consequences are no longer just a data game—they will directly evolve into AI encroaching on real life. By then, it’s not just the economic ledger that can’t support it, but the entire functioning of the country.
So the key isn’t how high 7% is right now, but that this number is rapidly approaching a critical point, and we still can’t see clearly what true value AI computing power can bring.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BTCRetirementFund
· 5h ago
Starting to calculate this number again, but what I care more about is, who will pay for this 7% electricity fee?
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 12h ago
Well, basically it's burning electricity and money. What does it produce? The stock numbers just look good.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRat
· 12h ago
That's not right. This logic has some issues... Do we really need to consider a 7% growth rate for the three major industries? Feels like this data is pretty heavily pieced together.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 12h ago
Wait, so now the US power grid is being heavily affected by AI? Is the electricity bill for data centers really skyrocketing?
View OriginalReply0
ETHmaxi_NoFilter
· 12h ago
Wait, isn't there a bit of a problem with this logic... Can 7% to 8% really swallow the growth rates of the three major industries? How is the math calculated?
The fact that AI consumes electricity is indeed intense, but to be blunt—who can't see the value being generated now, or do they just refuse to admit it?
The 33% ceiling... Can the US achieve that? Are you serious?
Capital is all about stacking up; isn't that just the game rules? Who's to blame?
The key is, where does the electricity come from? If nuclear energy isn't keeping up, then everything else is pointless.
There is a piece of data worth paying attention to—AI computing power consumption in the US has already accounted for 7% of the country's total electricity generation. This proportion may not seem large, but upon deeper reflection, being just one step away from 8% makes it significant.
What’s even more concerning is that the value generated by this electricity consumption has become a question mark. Let’s see what 8% really means: it’s roughly equivalent to three times 2.714%. In other words, the demand for AI computing power in the US is consuming the natural growth rate of the country’s three major pillar industries.
This is the real issue. Once the power consumption for computing exceeds 8% and still fails to produce genuine value, the entire logic of AI computing power will be challenged. Because this is akin to mobilizing the entire nation’s effort to force the growth dividends of the three major industries into the AI basket, only to find it’s like drawing water with a bamboo basket—value has nowhere to go.
Of course, to continue boosting stock prices, some capital may keep stacking computing power and expanding electricity consumption. But there is a strict rule: 33.33% of the total US electricity capacity is the ceiling. Once this line is crossed, the consequences are no longer just a data game—they will directly evolve into AI encroaching on real life. By then, it’s not just the economic ledger that can’t support it, but the entire functioning of the country.
So the key isn’t how high 7% is right now, but that this number is rapidly approaching a critical point, and we still can’t see clearly what true value AI computing power can bring.