When large financial institutions start to take blockchain seriously, what they care about is never the story of getting rich overnight. What truly brings them to the negotiation table are three words: compliance.



Take the DUSK network as an example. It was never aimed at the retail market from the beginning. Conversely, the entire design logic is centered around answering one question—how to enable the traditional financial rules to transition smoothly into the blockchain world?

There are three core points.

**Privacy Protection**. On-chain transactions and smart contract logic are encrypted by default, meaning sensitive data such as business strategies and customer information are not visible to competitors or outsiders. For financial institutions, this is like giving them a key.

**Compliance and Transparency**. This is a clever reverse operation—an built-in selective disclosure mechanism allows transparent reporting to regulators without exposing the entire ledger. Regulators see what they need to see, and sensitive data remains protected.

**Controllable Tools**. Asset issuers and managers have on-chain control rights that comply with legal requirements. This is crucial for traditional finance, as they are accustomed to clear permission boundaries.

This explains why traditional tools like stocks, bonds, and fund shares can now be issued and circulated in digital asset form on such networks, while remaining fully compliant.

In simple terms, DUSK is not just a public chain, but a financial market infrastructure specifically designed for regulated assets.

The global enthusiasm for RWA (Real World Assets) is entering a new phase, and underlying protocols with these capabilities are becoming scarce. DUSK has moved from the technical validation stage to actual operation, with traditional sector partners already testing this solution. This is not a future possibility but a present reality. If you are concerned about how trillions of assets will be tokenized in the future, the progress of this chain is worth continuous attention.
DUSK-5,84%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SquidTeachervip
· 6h ago
Wow, this is the real big deal, not those coins that shout "rise, rise, rise" every day. --- Compliance may sound simple, but actually doing it right is true skill. DUSK's logic is indeed excellent. --- Balancing privacy + transparency is achievable; no wonder traditional finance is willing to play. --- Honestly, the RWA track is just beginning. Those who seize the infrastructure have a real advantage. --- But it depends on whether significant funds will enter later; just telling stories isn't enough. --- That's why I've always said to pay attention to those less popular but solid projects. --- For trillion-level assets going on-chain, someone needs to pave the way first. DUSK is leading the way. --- Honestly, compared to those hyped-up projects, this low-key approach is more imaginative. --- Selective disclosure is brilliant—meeting regulatory requirements while protecting privacy. Who would have thought? --- This wave of RWA is no small matter. Those prepared should start paying attention now.
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictimvip
· 6h ago
This is the right way, financial institutions are just eating this up --- Compliance really hit the mark, but is DUSK really reliable --- Exactly, the balance between privacy and transparency is the true productivity --- Trillions in assets on the chain... just thinking about it is exciting, must keep a close watch --- I love the concept of reverse operation, clever --- Wait, could selective disclosure become a new vulnerability? --- Traditional finance prefers this, clear permission divisions --- The present tense isn't just empty talk, we need to see the partner list --- RWA is really about to take off, I believe in this kind of infrastructure --- All the RWA concept stocks pulled out of blind boxes... I don't buy it --- Privacy protection is much better than other public chains --- The question is, will regulators really cooperate? --- Controlling the issuance rights of assets is the key, everything else is not important
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 6h ago
Oh no, finally someone is taking compliance seriously, not just shouting about decentralization every day. Traditional finance operates this way—if privacy and permission separation aren't maintained, they simply won't touch it, and the risk control department would be in chaos. Regarding RWA, someone really needs to build the infrastructure properly; the DUSK approach is correct.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlphavip
· 6h ago
Compliance is indeed a genuine requirement for institutions; the retail trading approach simply can't attract them.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)