Regarding the "triangle dilemma" of public blockchains, the community has debated for ten years without reaching a definitive conclusion. Achieving security, decentralization, and high performance simultaneously is difficult, almost like a curse embedded in the code. But recently, some breakthrough solutions have emerged, and this longstanding problem may finally be resolved.



There are two core technologies. The first is PeerDAS, which allows nodes to break free from the necessity of downloading all data. Through "sampling verification," security is guaranteed without sacrificing decentralization, and performance can be significantly improved. The second is zkEVM, which eliminates the need for nodes to execute every transaction repeatedly; a single zero-knowledge proof suffices for validation, effectively shifting from "solving problems" to "checking answers," drastically reducing the computational burden.

According to current plans, between 2026 and 2030, we will see an efficient and secure L1 base layer, covered with countless parallel L2 networks. Users may not even perceive the existence of the "chain," yet the actual throughput could reach hundreds of thousands of TPS. More importantly, how lightweight will the validation become? It could be done on a mobile phone.

The ultimate goal of this approach points to a concept called "exit testing"—even if all core developers and service providers disappear, the network can still operate autonomously and securely. It sounds distant, but this is not about compromise; rather, it’s a rebalancing of the "triangle" through modular engineering thinking.

Therefore, the answer to the problem is not "choose one," but to break through the old constraints with a completely new architecture. In a few years, looking back, these debates will seem as primitive as trying to breed faster horses before the invention of the automobile. What blockchain is building is a global, never-down financial infrastructure. How vast this potential is depends on your perspective.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 8h ago
It's been ten years of arguing, and now they say it can be solved? Let's see what happens in 2026 first. --- PeerDAS and zkEVM sound promising, but verifying on mobile is a bit questionable; it depends on how it's implemented. --- The analogy of raising horses is quite surreal, but I'm more concerned about when these solutions will actually be implemented—don't let it be all talk again. --- Never-down infrastructure? Wake up, buddy. Which chain has truly achieved that so far? --- Modular thinking is good, but do nodes really operate that lightly, or is it just another marketing concept? --- Hundred thousand TPS sounds great, but can centralized L2 stacking really be considered a true solution? --- The key is who will actually push this forward. Right now, these projects are all just storytelling. --- How many people have said the same thing before? And in the end? I remain skeptical. --- The concept of exit testing is quite idealistic; can it actually work in reality?
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Banditvip
· 8h ago
heard this peerDAS talk for like three years now... we'll see when it actually ships lmao
Reply0
ShortingEnthusiastvip
· 8h ago
There's nothing wrong with that; those previous black-and-white debates were indeed pointless. But to be honest, I'm still a bit skeptical about whether PeerDAS and zkEVM can really be as smooth as they're hyped up to be. A hundred thousand TPS sounds great, but I'm worried it might turn out to be the next "wolf coming." However, the modular approach is quite clever, indeed like looking at the problem from a different perspective. If mobile verification nodes can truly become widespread, then that would be a real breakthrough.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 8h ago
Hmm... PeerDAS and zkEVM sound promising, but this grand vision for 2026-2030 still feels a bit虚 (vague/empty). Hundred thousand TPS, mobile verification, self-running after leaving the scene... On paper, it's indeed impressive. The key question is, how many projects have actually delivered so far? Compared to the period before car manufacturing when they were just raising horses, I have to say, this analogy looks good, but in reality, we still have a few years of差 (shortcomings/inefficiencies) to endure.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaversevip
· 8h ago
The ten-year debate is finally about to be overturned, and it feels a bit like a dream. PeerDAS with zkEVM, at first glance, sounds unbelievable. I really want to see what it looks like in 2026. Mobile verification? If that really becomes possible, those worried about centralization can finally shut up. But to be honest, the goal of "exit testing" sounds a bit far-fetched; it still depends on how it actually performs when run. From solving problems to checking answers, the analogy is indeed excellent.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoardervip
· 8h ago
Speaking of PeerDAS and zkEVM, these two things are indeed quite interesting. Finally, someone has thought of breaking the deadlock. Honestly, ten years of debate has been pretty boring. Now this modular approach is finally on point. Can it also verify on mobile? If this really becomes a reality, the entry barrier for ordinary people will be much lower. However, waiting from 2026 to 2030 is still a long time, and whether it can be delivered by then is another story. Never-down financial infrastructure sounds truly dreamy, but reality often hits hard. These folks always like to make big promises. I'm just waiting to see if it can truly be implemented. If a hundred-thousand TPS can run stably, that would really be revolutionary.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)