2026-01-15 13:26:40

A certain trading platform has recently experienced a surge in visitors, causing occasional webpage lag. I spent quite a bit of time conducting a comprehensive test—starting from an initial small amount of 100U and gradually increasing to 2000U, executing a total of 100 transactions, with the final wear and tear kept within 40U.

Through this practical test, I found that **stablecoin trading pairs are the most efficient choice**. Using a trading volume of 100,000U as a reference, the fee loss can be managed with just a few U, which is quite cost-effective. But there's a prerequisite— the transaction amount must be large enough; the fee advantage of small transactions diminishes with lower amounts.

If the goal is to earn the Level 2 reward of 400GP, it is recommended to use a trading amount of over 1000U for the sweep. This approach helps to spread out transaction costs and more steadily accumulate level progress.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NftMetaversePainter

· 01-15 13:56

actually, the algorithmic efficiency you've discovered here is precisely what i'd call a blockchain primitive optimization—the way stablecoin pairs flatten the fee topology reminds me of my generative series on computational aesthetics and capital flow visualization... but ngl, most traders will never grasp the topological implications of what you're describing

Reply0

SleepTrader

· 01-15 13:56

100 trades only cost 40U in slippage, this guy is serious --- Stablecoin trading is indeed comfortable, but you need to have principal --- Trading starting from 1000U is more cost-effective, small investors still need to think about it --- Has the webpage lag issue been resolved, or does it still drop the connection --- This data looks reliable, but is the platform really stable? I'm a bit worried --- 400GP rewards sound good, but the key is whether you can keep trading consistently --- Saving a few U in transaction fees is indeed beneficial, but what about slippage? That wasn't mentioned --- Large transaction fee rate optimization, small trades get exploited, old trick --- Trading for GP feels a bit exhausting and unprofitable --- Wait, the platform lag issue hasn't been fundamentally solved yet, right

View OriginalReply0

ContractFreelancer

· 01-15 13:55

A single trade with a slippage of only 40U, this guy is serious, stablecoin pairs are really good --- Starting from 1000U to spread out the costs, small investors still need to find a way --- Doing this kind of test when the webpage is lagging, haha, quite brave --- If this data is real, it’s worth testing the efficiency of stablecoin pairs --- The slippage is controlled so precisely, it shows that the platform’s trading depth is pretty good --- Wait, has the Level 2 400GP rule been changed long ago? Are you sure this is still valid? --- A fee of only a few U for 100,000U trading volume is really a good deal for big players --- Small trades have no advantage anyway, why bother? --- Even when the platform is lagging, I can still get such complete data, my internet connection even dropped --- It feels like the test from 100U to 2000U isn’t very scientific, isn’t there a more detailed stratification in between?

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 01-15 13:55

Really? 100 trades only wear down 40U. Why do I feel like I've been ripped off? What does it mean that this guy's fee advantage isn't that obvious? Honestly, it just means small investors can't play. Starting from 1000U to do a sweep, your suggestion is really tailored for big players. Wait, how did you calculate 100,000U? The total fee is only a few U. Is there some trick I don't know about? The platform lags but you can still calmly do 100 trades. I really can't learn this patience. Fees are cut again, and the level is still far away. Why bother, everyone? To be honest, doing a sweep with stablecoins sounds like a harvesting machine turning. How can anyone still believe in this? It looks pretty虚 to me. No, you say to spread out the costs, but I think our small wallets can't handle that at all. I'm already tired of the level-based sweep system. As long as this platform doesn't crash, it's good enough. The lag is really the worst. Fees are a bit lower, but has anyone calculated the time cost?

View OriginalReply0

TokenStorm

· 01-15 13:50

After analyzing 100 backtest data points, a 40U wear and tear is indeed quite good, but I am more concerned about whether the platform's matching engine is truly stable under high concurrency... Lag issues are a bit risky. Stablecoin swaps indeed have the lowest fees, but this set of logic only applies to those with spare funds; small investors simply can't afford to play this game. Starting from 1000U, it sounds simple, but when actually executing, you need to consider opportunity costs. Is the GP reward worth that money? My judgment is that it's not worth it, but how to calculate the risk factor still depends on your own judgment.

View OriginalReply0

DiamondHands

· 01-15 13:49

Damn, finally someone figured this out. I always thought small transactions were too costly. Stablecoin swaps are indeed much more convenient than those knockoff coins, cutting costs by half. Starting from 1000U, honestly, this isn't very friendly to retail investors. Lagging is really annoying; just when you're about to trade, it gets stuck, resulting in significant losses. Level rewards are good, but the fees are really hefty, no wonder big players are here squeezing profits. How long did it take you to complete these 100 trades? That's quite a workload. Keeping wear and tear within 40U—what level is that? How does it compare to other platforms?

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 01-15 13:27

Only 40U in fees for 100 trades, this rate is really good. Stablecoins are just so satisfying to trade against. Wait, has the webpage lag issue been resolved? It seems like many people have been complaining about it recently. Starting from 1000U for making trades, small investors are definitely being discouraged.

View OriginalReply0