2026-01-15 13:27:44

The three eras of financial privacy:

The first stage is the cash circulation era—natural privacy but untraceable; the second stage shifts to digital accounts, with skyrocketing transparency but complete loss of privacy. Currently, Web3 is opening the third door: programmable privacy.

This is not just a simple privacy protection tool, but a modular system that makes privacy detachable and assemble-able. Developers' perspectives are changing—they no longer need to develop privacy layers from scratch but can quickly integrate privacy features like third-party APIs. What about the user side? Much more flexible. If full anonymity is needed, turn it all on; if traceability is required, lower the level. The entire process is as intuitive as adjusting the volume.

This composability is reshaping DApp development efficiency, while also evolving privacy from a black-and-white state into a scenario-based, controllable existence.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlippedSignal

· 1h ago

Adjusting privacy is like turning the volume up or down? It sounds great, but in practice, will it just be a bunch of complicated parameter settings...

View OriginalReply0

StableGeniusDegen

· 10h ago

Someone finally explained it clearly: privacy should be managed like adjusting the volume for it to work properly.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 17h ago

Hmm... sounds good, but will it still be a mess when actually applied?

View OriginalReply0

MemeEchoer

· 01-15 13:57

Wow, this logic is really clever, adjusting privacy and volume the same way... But is it really safe? Isn't it just creating a new point of information leakage?

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 01-15 13:57

The concept of programmable privacy is truly amazing; finally, there's no need to choose between privacy and transparency.

View OriginalReply0

CommunitySlacker

· 01-15 13:54

Wow, someone finally explained privacy clearly. The volume adjustment analogy is perfect.

View OriginalReply0

EternalMiner

· 01-15 13:53

Programmable privacy sounds good, but how many projects can truly achieve "arbitrary control"? Most are probably just a facade.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityWorker

· 01-15 13:45

The concept of programmable privacy sounds good, but how many people will actually use it once implemented?

View OriginalReply0

ShortingEnthusiast

· 01-15 13:45

It's the same old privacy argument. No matter how eloquently it's put, it's still a false proposition. Everything on the chain is transparent; it's just a matter of perspective, and it can't be hidden at all.

View OriginalReply0

EntryPositionAnalyst

· 01-15 13:42

I think the idea of "programmable privacy" is interesting, but there's still a question mark about whether it can be practically implemented. --- True privacy is always a compromise. Web3's solution sounds great, but how does it feel to use... --- Adjusting the volume should be as intuitive? Well, that depends on whether the exchange is willing to give you that permission. --- Composability is very appealing, but will users really actively adjust their privacy levels? To be honest, most people don't care at all. --- From cash to digital accounts to programmable options, it feels like Web3 has just given us back the choice, but having choices itself can also be a burden.

View OriginalReply0