A recent on-chain conversation featured guests raising sharp questions about certain phenomena in the BSC ecosystem, receiving candid responses. The content is worth sharing.
**Core Pain Points of the Issue**
The BSC chain has indeed become highly competitive recently. Whenever there is a slight movement on Twitter, development teams immediately follow suit by issuing tokens, and trading experts swiftly enter the market to build positions. By the time retail investors react and rush in, the market has already multiplied tenfold or more, but the main profits have long been divided among early movers and professional traders. Retail investors end up as bagholders. Does this speed-driven, layered harvesting model promote or harm the MEME ecosystem?
**Five Core Perspectives from the Guest**
First, regarding the phenomenon of front-running. Decentralization is inherently a competition for efficiency. Faster participants will always earn more, which is an inevitable result of system design. As market participants become more professional, the reaction speed gap between retail and institutional investors will only widen. This cannot be avoided and should not be ignored.
Second, about human intervention. Introducing third parties to regulate these behaviors would actually lead to greater centralization. Currently, there is neither the ability nor the need to manually regulate the natural operation of the chain.
Third, on freedom of speech. Some suggest reducing social media activity to lessen follow-the-leader behavior, but this contradicts the original intention of decentralization. Individuals have the right to express themselves and should not self-censor because their statements might be seen as investment signals.
Fourth, regarding the value of MEME tokens themselves. Those tokens created solely to ride the hype have a failure rate exceeding 90%. Most lack long-term cultural accumulation and community foundation.
Fifth, summary of viewpoints. The entire discussion revolves around a core logic: decentralization has its costs, and participants must accept the true face of the market.
**Reflections Behind the Phenomenon**
This conversation reflects a fundamental dilemma. The prosperity of BSC is rooted in the transparency of its mechanisms, but this transparency also amplifies information gaps and speed differences. Retail investors must either improve their professionalism or accept market selection. There is no middle ground.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTears
· 8h ago
Retail investors are always the last to know.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 8h ago
Basically, it's a speed game; slow people get left behind.
Retail investors have long been used to being cut, and complaining is useless.
Traders build positions in seconds, and we buy in seconds. This is the true nature of decentralization.
MEME coins have a 90% failure rate, so what about the other 10%... that's what people are betting on.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMiner
· 8h ago
Basically, it's a speed game. If you can't play it well, just don't play.
Retail investors are always a step behind; you have to accept it.
Thinking about the coin I bought last time... the market has tripled, and I only saw the tweet now.
This is the price of decentralization, freedom but brutal.
But a 90% failure rate is really absolute; most of them are trash.
Instead of watching the charts every day and rushing to buy, it's better to find projects with a solid community foundation.
Honestly, it would be great if we could really avoid this, but there's no way around it.
The fate of a bagholder can't be changed.
A recent on-chain conversation featured guests raising sharp questions about certain phenomena in the BSC ecosystem, receiving candid responses. The content is worth sharing.
**Core Pain Points of the Issue**
The BSC chain has indeed become highly competitive recently. Whenever there is a slight movement on Twitter, development teams immediately follow suit by issuing tokens, and trading experts swiftly enter the market to build positions. By the time retail investors react and rush in, the market has already multiplied tenfold or more, but the main profits have long been divided among early movers and professional traders. Retail investors end up as bagholders. Does this speed-driven, layered harvesting model promote or harm the MEME ecosystem?
**Five Core Perspectives from the Guest**
First, regarding the phenomenon of front-running. Decentralization is inherently a competition for efficiency. Faster participants will always earn more, which is an inevitable result of system design. As market participants become more professional, the reaction speed gap between retail and institutional investors will only widen. This cannot be avoided and should not be ignored.
Second, about human intervention. Introducing third parties to regulate these behaviors would actually lead to greater centralization. Currently, there is neither the ability nor the need to manually regulate the natural operation of the chain.
Third, on freedom of speech. Some suggest reducing social media activity to lessen follow-the-leader behavior, but this contradicts the original intention of decentralization. Individuals have the right to express themselves and should not self-censor because their statements might be seen as investment signals.
Fourth, regarding the value of MEME tokens themselves. Those tokens created solely to ride the hype have a failure rate exceeding 90%. Most lack long-term cultural accumulation and community foundation.
Fifth, summary of viewpoints. The entire discussion revolves around a core logic: decentralization has its costs, and participants must accept the true face of the market.
**Reflections Behind the Phenomenon**
This conversation reflects a fundamental dilemma. The prosperity of BSC is rooted in the transparency of its mechanisms, but this transparency also amplifies information gaps and speed differences. Retail investors must either improve their professionalism or accept market selection. There is no middle ground.