Recently, the wallet platform launched a new exclusive Booster event and token issuance—Unitas ($UP). I’ve compiled data on all current Booster projects to see if the trend patterns from previous projects can provide some reference for tokens that haven't launched yet.
As of mid-January, this Booster project database has already shown some results:
**The 13 launched projects show clear differentiation** — 9 projects are typical of "peak at launch," followed by a continuous decline. From their historical highs to now, the average drop ranges between 80% and 95%, with most projects having already fallen below their initial opening prices.
Compared to the opening price, only BAS and PIEVERSE remain above their launch prices; the rest have been halved or worse.
**The number of task periods is an interesting indicator.** Projects with only 1 task period almost all follow the "peak at launch" fate—entering a long decline after closing. Conversely, projects with more task periods, especially those with lower initial market caps, tend to reach new highs more easily.
Based on this pattern, the speculation is: if REVA drops below its opening price at launch, it might be a good opportunity to buy and hold the spot long-term. However, for tokens like UP and BTW, issuing tokens at launch could very likely repeat the "peak at launch" scenario.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProbablyNothing
· 01-15 14:00
It's the same trick again, single-episode tasks are doomed. Looks like I have to wait for REVA's breakout opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 01-15 13:56
An 80 to 95% decline—that's why I don't touch Booster anymore, brother.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMiner
· 01-15 13:36
Another booster project with a mess... 80%-95% drop, how much must one lose to be that unlucky?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 01-15 13:33
An 80 to 95% decline is truly incredible. If this isn't cutting leeks, what is? Booster has become a slaughterhouse.
It's the same old story of hitting the peak right after launch. It seems only projects with more task periods have a chance.
I bet $5 that UP and BTW will meet the same fate. If REVA really drops below the opening price, I might try to buy the dip.
Out of 13 projects, only 2 are still alive—it's really quite ironic. This platform is a bit outrageous.
Only projects with many task periods can survive. In plain terms, if there's no hype, it dies. These numbers don't lie.
Recently, the wallet platform launched a new exclusive Booster event and token issuance—Unitas ($UP). I’ve compiled data on all current Booster projects to see if the trend patterns from previous projects can provide some reference for tokens that haven't launched yet.
As of mid-January, this Booster project database has already shown some results:
**The 13 launched projects show clear differentiation** — 9 projects are typical of "peak at launch," followed by a continuous decline. From their historical highs to now, the average drop ranges between 80% and 95%, with most projects having already fallen below their initial opening prices.
Compared to the opening price, only BAS and PIEVERSE remain above their launch prices; the rest have been halved or worse.
**The number of task periods is an interesting indicator.** Projects with only 1 task period almost all follow the "peak at launch" fate—entering a long decline after closing. Conversely, projects with more task periods, especially those with lower initial market caps, tend to reach new highs more easily.
Based on this pattern, the speculation is: if REVA drops below its opening price at launch, it might be a good opportunity to buy and hold the spot long-term. However, for tokens like UP and BTW, issuing tokens at launch could very likely repeat the "peak at launch" scenario.