State Street has recently been adjusting its ETF branding strategy, planning to abandon the SPDR label and instead use State Street to directly name their three longstanding UIT-structured ETFs—SPY, MDY, and DIA. It seems there may be a bigger move behind the scenes.
Interestingly, this operation reminds me of the previous moves with QQQ. Could State Street also be planning a similar strategy? For example, converting these UIT-structured products into open-end funds? The benefits of doing so are obvious—greater product flexibility and potential optimization of management fees.
However, this is just a reasonable speculation based on the brand adjustment. If such a conversion actually occurs, the impact on investors who hold these ETFs long-term probably won't be too significant, but the attributes of the products themselves would indeed change.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashBandit
· 14h ago
ngl, dropping SPDR branding feels like a classic rebranding smokescreen... probably prepping for some backend infrastructure shift. UIT to open-end conversion would absolutely tank gas fees on the settlement layer, not gonna lie. reminds me of when bitcoin was still mineable on GPU and everyone was shuffling pool structures around. anyway, watching this one closely.
State Street has recently been adjusting its ETF branding strategy, planning to abandon the SPDR label and instead use State Street to directly name their three longstanding UIT-structured ETFs—SPY, MDY, and DIA. It seems there may be a bigger move behind the scenes.
Interestingly, this operation reminds me of the previous moves with QQQ. Could State Street also be planning a similar strategy? For example, converting these UIT-structured products into open-end funds? The benefits of doing so are obvious—greater product flexibility and potential optimization of management fees.
However, this is just a reasonable speculation based on the brand adjustment. If such a conversion actually occurs, the impact on investors who hold these ETFs long-term probably won't be too significant, but the attributes of the products themselves would indeed change.