【Preface: The Reason for the Existence of Public Blockchains in Article 101】
In a market dominated by giants like Ethereum, Solana, and SUI, do we really need new public blockchains?
If we only consider speed—frankly, not really.
But let’s ask from a different perspective: where is institutional-grade capital going? The answer would be different. Very different.
Web3 is undergoing a silent transformation—from a geek playground to an experimental field for compliant finance. Wall Street has never lacked money; what it needs is a ledger that complies with regulatory frameworks while protecting trade secrets. A decentralized, transparent yet controllable ledger.
This is where Dusk’s opportunity lies.
Don’t be fooled by project marketing; Dusk is not a rising star. Since its founding in 2018, this team of Dutch engineers has been tackling a seemingly impossible hard problem: can privacy and compliance coexist?
Look at the fate of traditional privacy coins—the result of complete anonymity is being delisted from mainstream exchanges. On Ethereum’s side, they chose full transparency, exposing all business-sensitive information. Both extremes are impractical.
This is precisely the issue that must be addressed before RWA (Real-World Assets) can be widely integrated into blockchain. If 2026 truly marks the explosion of RWA, projects that have made the right choices now may seize unexpected opportunities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearEatsAll
· 21h ago
Privacy + compliance sounds good in theory, but can it really be sold to Wall Street? Or is it just another PPT dream?
View OriginalReply0
PhantomHunter
· 21h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly be balanced? It still feels like a false proposition.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 21h ago
Privacy and compliance coexist? It sounds like walking a tightrope between a fish and a bear's paw. If Dusk can balance it, it wins.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 21h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly be achieved simultaneously? I remain skeptical. Wall Street folks just want it all—both want and need.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntress
· 21h ago
Privacy + compliance is indeed a difficult question to get right, but can Dusk really strike a balance? After research and analysis, there are issues with the tokenomics design. Monitor the movements of these wallet addresses before making a decision.
【Preface: The Reason for the Existence of Public Blockchains in Article 101】
In a market dominated by giants like Ethereum, Solana, and SUI, do we really need new public blockchains?
If we only consider speed—frankly, not really.
But let’s ask from a different perspective: where is institutional-grade capital going? The answer would be different. Very different.
Web3 is undergoing a silent transformation—from a geek playground to an experimental field for compliant finance. Wall Street has never lacked money; what it needs is a ledger that complies with regulatory frameworks while protecting trade secrets. A decentralized, transparent yet controllable ledger.
This is where Dusk’s opportunity lies.
Don’t be fooled by project marketing; Dusk is not a rising star. Since its founding in 2018, this team of Dutch engineers has been tackling a seemingly impossible hard problem: can privacy and compliance coexist?
Look at the fate of traditional privacy coins—the result of complete anonymity is being delisted from mainstream exchanges. On Ethereum’s side, they chose full transparency, exposing all business-sensitive information. Both extremes are impractical.
This is precisely the issue that must be addressed before RWA (Real-World Assets) can be widely integrated into blockchain. If 2026 truly marks the explosion of RWA, projects that have made the right choices now may seize unexpected opportunities.