#数字资产市场动态 Suddenly receiving a voice message in the middle of the night, it was a seasoned trader’s complaint: holding 10,000 USDT, fully leveraged 10x long, and as the market retraced 3%, the account was wiped out.
Looking at his trading screenshot, all 9,500 USDT was invested without even setting a stop-loss—this is a common trap many people fall into.
Many novice traders have a misconception that full-position holding equals stronger risk resistance. Quite the opposite. Full position may seem aggressive, but in reality, it’s a double-edged sword; misused, it can lead to faster ruin.
Why is full position more prone to liquidation? It’s not about leverage, but about position sizing. For example, with a 1,000 USDT account, investing 900 USDT with 10x leverage, a 5% adverse move will directly liquidate the position; but if only 100 USDT is invested, it takes a 50% move to be wiped out. That guy put 95% of his capital in, with 10x leverage, so a small retracement couldn’t be withstanded.
So how to use full positions without getting liquidated? After half a year of real trading, I’ve summarized three strict rules.
**Control single trades to 20% of total funds.** For a 10,000 USDT account, invest at most 2,000 USDT per trade. Even with a wrong directional judgment and a 10% stop-loss, the loss is only 200 USDT, which is 2% of the principal—nothing to damage the core capital, and there’s room to recover.
**Set the maximum single-loss limit at 3% of total funds.** Taking 2,000 USDT with 10x leverage as an example, pre-calculate the stop-loss at 1.5%, resulting in a 300 USDT loss—exactly 3% of total funds. Even if caught multiple times, it won’t drain the account.
**During consolidation phases, refrain from trading; after profits, avoid adding to positions.** Only step in decisively when a true trend breakout occurs. During sideways movement, don’t trade even if tempting; even if entering successfully, strictly control the position, never chase high or add on, to avoid emotional trading.
The essence of full position isn’t to gamble on direction, but to leave buffer space. Its role is to provide more room for adjustment amid volatility. But the prerequisite is light position testing combined with strict risk control—both are essential.
There was a trader who kept getting liquidated every month, but after following these three principles, he grew his account from 5,000 USDT to 8,000 USDT in just three months. His insight was: “I used to think full position was for gambling big; now I realize, full position is actually for long-term stability.”
The trading journey is long, and a stable strategy often yields better results than aggressive risk-taking. Master these points, and your account can progress more steadily.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoDeveloper
· 01-15 14:23
the position sizing mechanics here are basically just risk management primitives applied to leverage systems... honestly the 20% rule reads like a kelly criterion derivative, which makes sense empirically. what's interesting is framing full position as "buffer creation" rather than directional betting — that's actually sound game theory, not just trader wisdom.
Reply0
BearMarketBuyer
· 01-15 14:09
Bro, this blood and tears lesson really hit me in the heart. Going all-in without stop-loss is just asking for death. I've seen too many such naive victims.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 01-15 13:58
It's the same old story, 20% per trade, 3% stop loss... I've heard it a hundred times. How many can truly stick to the discipline?
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletGuardian
· 01-15 13:56
Entering at 95% without stop-loss, this isn't trading, it's suicidal gambling...
#数字资产市场动态 Suddenly receiving a voice message in the middle of the night, it was a seasoned trader’s complaint: holding 10,000 USDT, fully leveraged 10x long, and as the market retraced 3%, the account was wiped out.
Looking at his trading screenshot, all 9,500 USDT was invested without even setting a stop-loss—this is a common trap many people fall into.
Many novice traders have a misconception that full-position holding equals stronger risk resistance. Quite the opposite. Full position may seem aggressive, but in reality, it’s a double-edged sword; misused, it can lead to faster ruin.
Why is full position more prone to liquidation? It’s not about leverage, but about position sizing. For example, with a 1,000 USDT account, investing 900 USDT with 10x leverage, a 5% adverse move will directly liquidate the position; but if only 100 USDT is invested, it takes a 50% move to be wiped out. That guy put 95% of his capital in, with 10x leverage, so a small retracement couldn’t be withstanded.
So how to use full positions without getting liquidated? After half a year of real trading, I’ve summarized three strict rules.
**Control single trades to 20% of total funds.** For a 10,000 USDT account, invest at most 2,000 USDT per trade. Even with a wrong directional judgment and a 10% stop-loss, the loss is only 200 USDT, which is 2% of the principal—nothing to damage the core capital, and there’s room to recover.
**Set the maximum single-loss limit at 3% of total funds.** Taking 2,000 USDT with 10x leverage as an example, pre-calculate the stop-loss at 1.5%, resulting in a 300 USDT loss—exactly 3% of total funds. Even if caught multiple times, it won’t drain the account.
**During consolidation phases, refrain from trading; after profits, avoid adding to positions.** Only step in decisively when a true trend breakout occurs. During sideways movement, don’t trade even if tempting; even if entering successfully, strictly control the position, never chase high or add on, to avoid emotional trading.
The essence of full position isn’t to gamble on direction, but to leave buffer space. Its role is to provide more room for adjustment amid volatility. But the prerequisite is light position testing combined with strict risk control—both are essential.
There was a trader who kept getting liquidated every month, but after following these three principles, he grew his account from 5,000 USDT to 8,000 USDT in just three months. His insight was: “I used to think full position was for gambling big; now I realize, full position is actually for long-term stability.”
The trading journey is long, and a stable strategy often yields better results than aggressive risk-taking. Master these points, and your account can progress more steadily.