The Pocket Network community has made a groundbreaking decision that redefines the foundations of its protocol. Through the community vote that concluded in December 2024, the decentralized network approved proposal PIP-41, a measure that radically pivots from an inflationary economic structure to a deflationary model for its token POKT. Implementation is scheduled for mid-January 2025, marking the beginning of a new era where the protocol’s burn rules will operate under principles of algorithmic scarcity.
The historic shift in Pocket Network’s monetary structure
For years, the Shannon model underpinning Pocket Network operated under a principle of monetary neutrality: each POKT token burned in relay transactions was exactly replaced by a new issuance to compensate node operators. This stability offered predictability but limited the potential for value accumulation.
With PIP-41, that balance fundamentally changes. Starting with technical update v1.31, only 97.5% of the eliminated tokens will be re-minted as rewards. The remaining 2.5% will permanently disappear from the ecosystem, creating a constant deflationary pressure directly linked to the network’s actual usage.
This change is not merely theoretical. Every processed relay—every blockchain data query performed through Pocket Network—now actively contributes to reducing the total supply of POKT. The network has transformed utility consumption into a mechanism of inflationary value destruction.
How the protocol’s new burn rules work
The elegance of the new system lies in its architectural simplicity. The flow is straightforward: an application requests data, pays in POKT, those tokens are burned, but only 97.5% of that amount is regenerated as an incentive for the nodes that processed the request.
The technical components of this transformation include:
Fee destruction: 100% of POKT paid for relays enters the burn process
Partial regeneration: Only 97.5% returns to the economic cycle as compensation to operators
Per-cycle impact: A net reduction of 2.5% in the total POKT supply
Consensus mechanism: Encoded in update v1.31, operating automatically and in a decentralized manner
Most importantly, this deflation does not require external intervention. No centralized actor controls when or how the burn occurs. It is purely algorithmic, determined by network activity. Greater adoption = faster supply reduction. Lower usage = slower deflation.
Node operators, a fundamental pillar of the infrastructure, will experience a marginal immediate impact on their nominal rewards (a 2.5% reduction), but potentially significant in real value if the token appreciates under deflationary pressure.
The economic reasoning behind the transformation
Protocols driven solely by emissions face a fundamental economic dilemma: if the new supply consistently exceeds demand, prices tend to deteriorate. Pocket Network recognizes this reality and has chosen to design a virtuous cycle where utility growth offsets emission reductions.
This change reflects a maturation in DAO economic thinking. Governance is no longer limited to initially distributing tokens; it now iteratively optimizes monetary policies to sustain long-term value.
The process leading to PIP-41 was rigorous. The proposal underwent multiple community review cycles, included in-depth technical analysis, and involved substantial participation from node operators, developers, and POKT holders. This diligence demonstrates the network’s commitment to data-driven and genuinely consensus-based decisions.
Differentiated impact based on participant roles
For POKT holders: The deflationary tokenomics introduces a value reserve feature layered over utility. Assuming stable or increasing relay demand, the supply reduction exerts a fundamental bullish pressure.
For node operators: Token rewards decrease nominally by 2.5%, but there is potential compensation if the POKT price rises. The calculation will depend on the network’s adoption speed post-implementation.
For dApp developers: The payment structure remains unchanged. They continue paying the same amount of POKT per relay. The change operates transparently in the protocol’s backend.
Economic model comparison: before and after
Aspect
Shannon Model (Pre-PIP-41)
New Model (Post-PIP-41)
Token burn
100% of fees
100% of fees
Re-minting
100% of burned value
97.5% of burned value
Supply pressure
Inflationary (neutral with other factors)
Deflationary (-2.5% per cycle)
Main economic goal
Security and incentives
Security, incentives + value accumulation
Sector context and precedents
In the decentralized infrastructure space, few protocols have executed such a deliberate monetary transformation post-launch. While competitors maintain conventional inflationary structures or rely on stablecoin payments, Pocket Network sets a new precedent: deflation directly tied to usage.
This decision will likely influence future governance discussions of other mature DAOs, especially those facing similar long-term sustainability pressures.
Key dates and implementation steps
Approval: December 2024
Technical update: Protocol version v1.31
Implementation date: Mid-January 2025
Requirement: All network nodes must update
Essential questions about the new tokenomics
What is the real impact of reducing only 2.5%?
Although it seems marginal, in a protocol processing millions of transactions, 2.5% results in constant, cumulative supply destruction. Over years, the compounded effect is significant, especially if network activity grows.
Do costs for end users change?
No. Developers and applications continue paying exactly the same for network access. The change is purely on the reward side for operators.
Why is this model better than purely inflationary?
It aligns incentives for the long term. With deflation linked to usage, holders benefit directly from adoption growth, creating a more sustainable value proposition than perpetual emissions.
What happens if network usage decreases?
Deflation slows naturally, as fewer transactions are burned. The mechanism self-regulates according to actual demand conditions.
Is this decision reversible?
Technically yes, through future governance voting. But the established precedent and community commitment make reversions highly unlikely.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Pocket Network revolutionizes its economic model: the deflationary transformation of POKT arrives in January
The Pocket Network community has made a groundbreaking decision that redefines the foundations of its protocol. Through the community vote that concluded in December 2024, the decentralized network approved proposal PIP-41, a measure that radically pivots from an inflationary economic structure to a deflationary model for its token POKT. Implementation is scheduled for mid-January 2025, marking the beginning of a new era where the protocol’s burn rules will operate under principles of algorithmic scarcity.
The historic shift in Pocket Network’s monetary structure
For years, the Shannon model underpinning Pocket Network operated under a principle of monetary neutrality: each POKT token burned in relay transactions was exactly replaced by a new issuance to compensate node operators. This stability offered predictability but limited the potential for value accumulation.
With PIP-41, that balance fundamentally changes. Starting with technical update v1.31, only 97.5% of the eliminated tokens will be re-minted as rewards. The remaining 2.5% will permanently disappear from the ecosystem, creating a constant deflationary pressure directly linked to the network’s actual usage.
This change is not merely theoretical. Every processed relay—every blockchain data query performed through Pocket Network—now actively contributes to reducing the total supply of POKT. The network has transformed utility consumption into a mechanism of inflationary value destruction.
How the protocol’s new burn rules work
The elegance of the new system lies in its architectural simplicity. The flow is straightforward: an application requests data, pays in POKT, those tokens are burned, but only 97.5% of that amount is regenerated as an incentive for the nodes that processed the request.
The technical components of this transformation include:
Most importantly, this deflation does not require external intervention. No centralized actor controls when or how the burn occurs. It is purely algorithmic, determined by network activity. Greater adoption = faster supply reduction. Lower usage = slower deflation.
Node operators, a fundamental pillar of the infrastructure, will experience a marginal immediate impact on their nominal rewards (a 2.5% reduction), but potentially significant in real value if the token appreciates under deflationary pressure.
The economic reasoning behind the transformation
Protocols driven solely by emissions face a fundamental economic dilemma: if the new supply consistently exceeds demand, prices tend to deteriorate. Pocket Network recognizes this reality and has chosen to design a virtuous cycle where utility growth offsets emission reductions.
This change reflects a maturation in DAO economic thinking. Governance is no longer limited to initially distributing tokens; it now iteratively optimizes monetary policies to sustain long-term value.
The process leading to PIP-41 was rigorous. The proposal underwent multiple community review cycles, included in-depth technical analysis, and involved substantial participation from node operators, developers, and POKT holders. This diligence demonstrates the network’s commitment to data-driven and genuinely consensus-based decisions.
Differentiated impact based on participant roles
For POKT holders: The deflationary tokenomics introduces a value reserve feature layered over utility. Assuming stable or increasing relay demand, the supply reduction exerts a fundamental bullish pressure.
For node operators: Token rewards decrease nominally by 2.5%, but there is potential compensation if the POKT price rises. The calculation will depend on the network’s adoption speed post-implementation.
For dApp developers: The payment structure remains unchanged. They continue paying the same amount of POKT per relay. The change operates transparently in the protocol’s backend.
Economic model comparison: before and after
Sector context and precedents
In the decentralized infrastructure space, few protocols have executed such a deliberate monetary transformation post-launch. While competitors maintain conventional inflationary structures or rely on stablecoin payments, Pocket Network sets a new precedent: deflation directly tied to usage.
This decision will likely influence future governance discussions of other mature DAOs, especially those facing similar long-term sustainability pressures.
Key dates and implementation steps
Essential questions about the new tokenomics
What is the real impact of reducing only 2.5%?
Although it seems marginal, in a protocol processing millions of transactions, 2.5% results in constant, cumulative supply destruction. Over years, the compounded effect is significant, especially if network activity grows.
Do costs for end users change?
No. Developers and applications continue paying exactly the same for network access. The change is purely on the reward side for operators.
Why is this model better than purely inflationary?
It aligns incentives for the long term. With deflation linked to usage, holders benefit directly from adoption growth, creating a more sustainable value proposition than perpetual emissions.
What happens if network usage decreases?
Deflation slows naturally, as fewer transactions are burned. The mechanism self-regulates according to actual demand conditions.
Is this decision reversible?
Technically yes, through future governance voting. But the established precedent and community commitment make reversions highly unlikely.