2026-01-15 14:23:24

I recently fell into a trap on a major wallet platform, and spending $50 as tuition taught me how to distinguish between genuine and scam coins. The fingerprint pattern on the Pixiu coin looked flawless, but in reality, it was one-way — it could only go in and not out. I only realized later that these types of coins require monitoring two key data points: the number of holding addresses and the top holder's percentage. When I bought it, the top holder's percentage was only 19%, but suddenly it skyrocketed to 99%, and the entire coin holdings were held by a mere 5 addresses. This clearly indicated something was off. I'm sharing this lesson now in hopes that everyone won't be fooled by these tricks again. Before choosing a coin, be sure to check these two items — they are really crucial.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MysteryBoxOpener

· 21h ago

Damn, Pixiu Coin is indeed amazing. I've also been caught once, and that feeling was truly suffocating.

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 21h ago

Paying 50U for tuition in exchange for experience isn't a loss. The key point is that the top accounts hold 99% and there are only 5 addresses. This looks like a rug pull preparation team.

View OriginalReply0

BearHugger

· 22h ago

The 50U tuition fee isn't unfair; the key is that the top share skyrocketed from 19% to 99%. Just 5 addresses can control the market. How outrageous is that?

View OriginalReply0