When it comes to privacy coins, many people's first reaction is Monero and Zcash—they use ring signatures, zk-SNARKs, and other fancy techniques to hide transactions thoroughly, truly maximizing privacy. The problem is, these coins are basically disconnected from mainstream finance; their strong privacy features often become a barrier.
Conversely, some public chains focused on smart contracts try to please regulators by removing or making privacy features optional. User privacy and transaction freedom are thus treated as bargaining chips.
Dusk Network wants to take a different approach: not a binary choice, but whether privacy protection and compliance requirements can be integrated together.
From the current market perspective, both camps have their shortcomings. On one side are privacy-first projects, which have limited functionality and tight regulatory relationships; on the other side are compliance-oriented solutions, which treat privacy as an optional add-on. For institutions that truly need to interact with traditional finance, this "optional" privacy is simply unreliable.
Dusk's idea is to use a strong privacy technology framework while considering compliance needs from the ground up. In simple terms, it aims to protect user data sovereignty on a public chain without making it impossible for regulators to trace. Whether this approach can succeed remains to be seen, but at least in terms of positioning, Dusk has found an angle that others haven't deeply explored.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RatioHunter
· 01-15 14:56
Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? It's easier to say than to do.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 01-15 14:56
The idea of dusk is indeed interesting; privacy and compliance don't necessarily have to be at odds.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwin
· 01-15 14:51
Can privacy and compliance be achieved simultaneously? It sounds great, but how can we ensure that regulators truly can't access the data?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercover
· 01-15 14:36
Is it really impossible for privacy and compliance to coexist? That's the gamble of Dusk.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblin
· 01-15 14:30
Can privacy and compliance really go hand in hand? Feels like you're overthinking it a bit.
When it comes to privacy coins, many people's first reaction is Monero and Zcash—they use ring signatures, zk-SNARKs, and other fancy techniques to hide transactions thoroughly, truly maximizing privacy. The problem is, these coins are basically disconnected from mainstream finance; their strong privacy features often become a barrier.
Conversely, some public chains focused on smart contracts try to please regulators by removing or making privacy features optional. User privacy and transaction freedom are thus treated as bargaining chips.
Dusk Network wants to take a different approach: not a binary choice, but whether privacy protection and compliance requirements can be integrated together.
From the current market perspective, both camps have their shortcomings. On one side are privacy-first projects, which have limited functionality and tight regulatory relationships; on the other side are compliance-oriented solutions, which treat privacy as an optional add-on. For institutions that truly need to interact with traditional finance, this "optional" privacy is simply unreliable.
Dusk's idea is to use a strong privacy technology framework while considering compliance needs from the ground up. In simple terms, it aims to protect user data sovereignty on a public chain without making it impossible for regulators to trace. Whether this approach can succeed remains to be seen, but at least in terms of positioning, Dusk has found an angle that others haven't deeply explored.