A major shift in US crypto market regulation efforts: The proposed Crypto Market Structure Bill faces delays following a significant policy reversal by one of America's largest digital asset platforms.



The withdrawal of support signals growing tensions between regulatory frameworks and industry stakeholders. Market participants are closely watching how this develops, as the legislation could reshape trading infrastructure, custody standards, and market surveillance across the sector.

The delay raises questions about the political viability of comprehensive crypto market regulation in the current environment. Industry observers suggest this highlights the influence major platforms wield in shaping US digital asset policy, and whether consensus can be built between Washington and market leaders on meaningful market structure reforms.

What's your take—does this represent a setback for regulatory clarity, or a necessary pause for stakeholder alignment?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractRebelvip
· 10h ago
Here comes the pump and dump again; these major platforms are all two-faced.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collectorvip
· 21h ago
Is it the same old story? A big platform's one-sentence bill causes delay again. Washington really has no power.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoullessvip
· 23h ago
Another major platform has turned hostile; this regulatory bill is probably dead in the water. What are the retail investors still hoping for?
View OriginalReply0
NotAFinancialAdvicevip
· 23h ago
Coming back with this again? When a major platform withdraws support and the entire bill falls apart, what does that mean? It shows that money still talks.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainArchaeologistvip
· 23h ago
It's the same story again—big platforms fold as soon as regulatory authorities turn against them.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 23h ago
Another regulatory plan that was "theoretically feasible" was quickly shut down by a major platform... This is what I mean, Lu Ban No. 7 is back at work, and this time it's digging a hole over in Washington.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysAnonvip
· 01-15 14:35
Playing the political struggle game again... Big platforms say no, and there's nothing regulatory authorities can do about it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)