Miden's approach to privacy protection is quite interesting — it does not impose a unified compliance rule at the protocol layer but instead leaves this to the application layer and asset layer to handle. The advantage of this approach is that it maintains the openness of the network without building any permission mechanisms, while also providing enough flexibility for real-world applications to meet regulatory requirements in different regions. In other words, privacy and compliance do not have to be at odds; the key is where the problem is addressed. Decentralizing decision-making to a level closer to the business can actually better balance the needs of both.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BridgeTrustFund
· 7h ago
This approach is indeed brilliant—decentralized but without passing the buck. Letting the application layer handle compliance itself is still smart.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 7h ago
Amazing, finally someone has figured this out. Privacy and compliance are about each doing their part; there's no need to fight at the foundational level.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 7h ago
Haha, I like this idea. Passing the burden to the application layer is indeed clever.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 7h ago
Hmm, this approach is indeed clever. Offloading the burden to the application layer actually solves the problem.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancake
· 7h ago
Hmm, this idea does have some merit. Delegating decision-making power sounds quite comfortable.
Miden's approach to privacy protection is quite interesting — it does not impose a unified compliance rule at the protocol layer but instead leaves this to the application layer and asset layer to handle. The advantage of this approach is that it maintains the openness of the network without building any permission mechanisms, while also providing enough flexibility for real-world applications to meet regulatory requirements in different regions. In other words, privacy and compliance do not have to be at odds; the key is where the problem is addressed. Decentralizing decision-making to a level closer to the business can actually better balance the needs of both.