#Strategy加仓BTC The essence of value investing is to do thorough research first, list out the targets, and then patiently wait for opportunities to arrive.
To be honest, I am now somewhat repelled by many public chain projects—not because of technical issues, but because of valuation logic. The most straightforward way to judge is to see how much cash flow the protocol itself can capture, using discounted cash flow methods to evaluate $SKY, $PUMP, etc., and then compare with market capitalization; sometimes the gap is surprisingly large.
In contrast, Bitcoin appears much more solid. Its value proposition is very simple and doesn’t require complex ecological arguments. Interestingly, the self-consistency logic of the Tron chain, I think, is sometimes even clearer than Ethereum’s—looking at the fundamentals from the price performance, it seems the market has already made its decision.
To put it simply, the rise and fall of coin prices are just surface phenomena of supply and demand. Once you see through this layer, you can better understand the true fundamentals of each chain and various assets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsDetective
· 3h ago
The discounted cash flow method really makes you realize the truth; those public chains have ridiculously inflated valuations.
View OriginalReply0
ShadowStaker
· 3h ago
ngl, the cash flow capture framework hits different once you actually run the numbers on these layer-1s. most projects are just vibes at this point
Reply0
SchroedingerGas
· 3h ago
Discounted cash flow analysis really makes these projects numb, the valuation logic is so absurd that I can't believe it.
BTC is straightforward and simple, no fancy stories, which is actually an advantage.
I agree with the self-consistency of the Tron logic; market votes don't lie.
Cash flow is the hard currency, everything else is just stories.
Adding to positions still needs to wait; opportunities don't come every day.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 4h ago
I agree with the logic of discounted cash flow analysis, but claiming that Tron is clearer than Ethereum? Bro, your point is a bit intense.
Really, now even clone chains are valued so ridiculously high, we still need to go back to the basics and look at cash flow.
BTC is always so simple and straightforward, and is actually the most resilient.
By the way, when it comes to waiting for opportunities, are you really patient? I, for one, can't wait.
#Strategy加仓BTC The essence of value investing is to do thorough research first, list out the targets, and then patiently wait for opportunities to arrive.
To be honest, I am now somewhat repelled by many public chain projects—not because of technical issues, but because of valuation logic. The most straightforward way to judge is to see how much cash flow the protocol itself can capture, using discounted cash flow methods to evaluate $SKY, $PUMP, etc., and then compare with market capitalization; sometimes the gap is surprisingly large.
In contrast, Bitcoin appears much more solid. Its value proposition is very simple and doesn’t require complex ecological arguments. Interestingly, the self-consistency logic of the Tron chain, I think, is sometimes even clearer than Ethereum’s—looking at the fundamentals from the price performance, it seems the market has already made its decision.
To put it simply, the rise and fall of coin prices are just surface phenomena of supply and demand. Once you see through this layer, you can better understand the true fundamentals of each chain and various assets.