The semiconductor sector continues to be hot this year, and SOXL, a triple leveraged US stock semiconductor ETF, has become a key allocation at the beginning of the year. Our strategy is clear—when it reaches $70, we start to reduce our positions gradually.
Focusing on the entire semiconductor industry chain, we maintain a heavy allocation, but we have made many adjustments to the weight distribution of specific stocks. The allocation weight of INTC now exceeds that of AVGO, and SNDK has been weighted to surpass ARM. Most importantly, we continue to increase the weight of TSMC.
This adjustment logic is based on judgments about changes in the upstream and downstream of the industry chain—the competitive landscape in different segments is evolving, and the positions of some leading companies are strengthening. Through this reweighting, we hope to better seize opportunities in the semiconductor cycle. Of course, we must also pay close attention to price signals; the $70 threshold is our risk control point.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Rekt_Recovery
· 1h ago
ngl the 70 dollar exit on soxl hits different when you've already gotten liquidated twice on leverage... good discipline tho, respect the risk mgmt mindset
Reply0
NFTHoarder
· 1h ago
Sell down at $70? Isn't this psychological price a bit conservative? It also depends on how the chip cycle unfolds later.
I agree with increasing TSMC's weight, but INTC's turnaround this time does feel a bit like gambling.
After saying a few years ago that it was doomed, now they're reallocating again. The volatility in chip stocks really tests the mentality.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarker
· 1h ago
ngl the 70 dollar exit on SOXL is basically saying "we don't actually know where the top is" but with extra steps... respect the honesty tho
Reply0
ApeEscapeArtist
· 1h ago
Sell at $70? Bro, that's a bit too conservative for take profit. SOXL's rally is still far from over.
---
Holding TSM heavily is fine, but dare to add INTC now? This guy's guts are pretty big.
---
Adjusting industry chain weights sounds professional, but in reality, it's just betting on TSMC... but there's no real problem with that.
---
Reducing positions in batches is smart, but I'm worried that if it still wants to wait at 70, a wave of pullback might make you regret it all.
---
SNDK surpassing ARM? That's an interesting layout; we'll see how the subsequent chip supply chain develops.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDoctor
· 1h ago
Sell down $70? Bro, your guts are really big. If SOXL can reach that level, I might as well go all in...
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeow
· 1h ago
Run away with just $70? You're really brave. I was aiming for $100.
View OriginalReply0
TerraNeverForget
· 1h ago
Reduce position by $70, this logic is quite clear. But can SOXL stay stable now?
The semiconductor sector continues to be hot this year, and SOXL, a triple leveraged US stock semiconductor ETF, has become a key allocation at the beginning of the year. Our strategy is clear—when it reaches $70, we start to reduce our positions gradually.
Focusing on the entire semiconductor industry chain, we maintain a heavy allocation, but we have made many adjustments to the weight distribution of specific stocks. The allocation weight of INTC now exceeds that of AVGO, and SNDK has been weighted to surpass ARM. Most importantly, we continue to increase the weight of TSMC.
This adjustment logic is based on judgments about changes in the upstream and downstream of the industry chain—the competitive landscape in different segments is evolving, and the positions of some leading companies are strengthening. Through this reweighting, we hope to better seize opportunities in the semiconductor cycle. Of course, we must also pay close attention to price signals; the $70 threshold is our risk control point.