Looking at some AI-related project tokens continuously weakening, I have some things I want to say.
Many projects in the early stages like to encourage retail investors to stake for yields or participate in new offerings, which sounds very tempting, but the reality is often harsh. The staking rewards can't withstand the sharp drop in token prices. Once large-scale promotion of staking becomes widespread, the subsequent price trend is almost doomed to spiral downward.
Think about how many people staked ATOM for airdrops back then? Now, the token price has long been halved, and those staking rewards have been wiped out by losses. This is not an isolated case. The staking mechanism itself is not the problem; the issue is that project teams use it to attract retail investors to take the risk. Once retail investors start taking profits, selling pressure follows. Plus, with continuous un-staking, the selling pressure in the market will only grow.
Ultimately, any project claiming to offer stable profits through staking should be questioned. Those yield returns are truly insignificant in the face of a bear market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropFatigue
· 6h ago
Staking? Haha, it's the same old story.
Staking ATOM was truly a painful lesson, so many people are still trapped in it.
The project teams' tactics are worn out, yet some still believe.
Earning yields can't withstand the decline at all, so true.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 6h ago
Staking rewards are worthless once the coin price drops; I'm tired of this trick.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 6h ago
Based on on-chain data tracking, I have long seen through the tricks of this staking yield model. The ATOM move was obvious—many addresses immediately dumped after unstaking, a typical dispersed selling pressure tactic, with a very clear pattern of fund association.
View OriginalReply0
GasBandit
· 6h ago
It's the old staking routine again, basically just a name change for a game of taking over.
Looking at some AI-related project tokens continuously weakening, I have some things I want to say.
Many projects in the early stages like to encourage retail investors to stake for yields or participate in new offerings, which sounds very tempting, but the reality is often harsh. The staking rewards can't withstand the sharp drop in token prices. Once large-scale promotion of staking becomes widespread, the subsequent price trend is almost doomed to spiral downward.
Think about how many people staked ATOM for airdrops back then? Now, the token price has long been halved, and those staking rewards have been wiped out by losses. This is not an isolated case. The staking mechanism itself is not the problem; the issue is that project teams use it to attract retail investors to take the risk. Once retail investors start taking profits, selling pressure follows. Plus, with continuous un-staking, the selling pressure in the market will only grow.
Ultimately, any project claiming to offer stable profits through staking should be questioned. Those yield returns are truly insignificant in the face of a bear market.