2026-01-15 19:25:05

Privacy is becoming increasingly important in Web3. Dusk Foundation, as a non-profit organization, focuses on cryptographic technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs. The core idea is to enable users to truly control their data.

They have two interesting main projects. One is the Dusk blockchain, which directly supports the operation of privacy smart contracts—meaning your transaction logic can run on-chain, but the details are a black box to outsiders; the other is the Citadel protocol, which aims to fundamentally change the rules of data monetization, giving data owners rather than platforms the bargaining power.

In simple terms, Dusk Foundation's goal is to promote the entire internet to shift from "data is king" to "privacy first." In the digital world, your transaction records, identity verification, personal information—these sensitive data should truly belong to you, not a centralized institution. This direction signifies a fundamental paradigm shift for both individuals and the entire industry ecosystem.

DUSK-2,23%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LidoStakeAddict

· 9h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing, privacy smart contracts, data sovereignty—sounds great but why is it so hard to implement in practice? Centralized platforms are already used to bleeding, why should they give data rights back to users? Laughable. Citadel Protocol sounds impressive, but I don't know how long it can last. Prioritizing privacy is the right direction, but it still feels a bit idealistic. Zero-knowledge proofs are discussed daily, but how many real-world scenarios are actually using them? Data monetization and power transfer? That’s even more difficult than forking Bitcoin. Dusk has this awareness, which is good; now it’s all about execution. Privacy should indeed be valued, but do users really care? Most people just want convenience.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 9h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs sound good, but I'm more concerned about when Dusk's audit report will be made public... Privacy contracts need to be truly secure and withstand white-hat testing before they can be considered reliable.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 9h ago

Wait, I need to analyze the Dusk funding chain. Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but does on-chain data really prove such transparency? Privacy contracts operate as black boxes from the start, which either indicates genius design or... you all understand, right? The Citadel protocol, with its multiple address tracking, makes it hard to determine who truly controls the data sovereignty. According to on-chain data, no matter how appealing the story of "privacy first" sounds, the real truth lies in where the money flows. A non-profit organization building a blockchain project? The obvious related-party network is worth a deep dive.

View OriginalReply0

BagHolderTillRetire

· 9h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but can they truly protect data? It still depends on implementation. --- Citadel is a good idea; data should indeed belong to oneself. --- Black box contracts sound great, but I'm worried that if something goes wrong, no one can investigate. --- Privacy above all? Ha, will big platforms agree? --- I like this logic; finally, someone wants to truly return power to the people. --- It sounds good, but are users really willing to manage their own data? --- Dusk's approach is correct, but its potential is limited. --- Data sovereignty should have been changed a long time ago; it's never too late.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureCollector

· 9h ago

Zero-knowledge proofs are truly impressive; having control over your data is the key to success.

View OriginalReply0