I work in an "ecological connection" role within a privacy-compliant blockchain ecosystem. Simply put, it’s about understanding the pain points of traditional finance and then finding scenarios where technology can truly solve problems. Over the years, my deepest realization is: no matter how advanced a technical protocol is, it ultimately depends on how many partners it can connect and how many real applications it can generate. Having technology alone is just a bunch of code.



In the early days, when discussing the concept of "privacy-compliant blockchain" with financial institutions, their reactions were generally the same: "Privacy is good, but how do you do KYC? How do you prevent money laundering?" — this is the first cognitive barrier. We abandoned pure technical explanations and instead took real solutions to knock on doors: "Look at this, a verifiable compliance report based on zero-knowledge proofs. Your transaction data is encrypted and stored, but the proofs required by regulators can be generated on demand at any time."

A real turning point came with our collaboration with NPEX Exchange in the Netherlands. Their needs were very clear: efficient on-chain settlement of securities, while complying with the strict financial market regulations of the EU. Our protocol layer design perfectly matched this pain point. A successful pilot is more effective than a thousand pages of white papers.

After that, ecosystem building accelerated. We realized that just providing a hammer (the underlying chain) isn’t enough; we also need tools like saws and nails. That’s why the Rusk SDK and Zedger asset issuance platform were developed, simplifying complex cryptographic operations and compliance processes into interfaces that developers can directly use. Only then can we truly trigger explosive growth within the ecosystem.

Looking back now, Web3’s success isn’t because the technology is cool, but because teams are willing to implement technology into real scenarios. On-chain settlement, privacy protection, compliance auditing — these are no longer just concepts but tools that financial institutions are actively using.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHuntervip
· 54m ago
Really, no matter how thick the white paper is, it’s useless. I just want to ask: Did the NPEX case actually go live? Or is it just another "coming soon" story?
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionistvip
· 9h ago
Speaking confidently, but I'm afraid most projects are still in the bragging stage.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodgervip
· 9h ago
That was too heartfelt; after the hype, it's time to show real skills.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTopsvip
· 9h ago
It's too realistic. Indeed, a bunch of technology that no one uses is just useless code. But why does it seem like most projects are still just hyping up how awesome their technology is, without any real implementation?
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealervip
· 9h ago
Wow, someone finally said it. Technology itself is useless; someone really has to get things done.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 9h ago
Well said, finally someone hit the nail on the head. Good technology looks good but doesn't necessarily work; someone truly needs to bridge those gaps.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)