Trading is really just about one word—complexity. Too many indicators can actually cause confusion; combining MACD, Bollinger Bands, KDJ all together, and in the end, you don't know whose advice to follow. A friend recently came up with something quite interesting: he cut down the #Strategy加仓BTC and $BTC operations to their core, removing all the flashy stuff, and focused only on a few solid signals. The result was a consistent win rate of around 80% in actual trading.
Basically, it's about doing subtraction—fewer variables make it easier to find patterns. Especially in this market cycle, although Bitcoin and Ethereum are quite volatile, simplifying the approach actually helps catch those true turning points. Many people end up losing money because of information overload, with a bunch of indicators contradicting each other, causing their psychological defenses to collapse.
Minimalist trading strategies may sound a bit risky, but data speaks for itself—win rate is something you can't be fooled by.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainOracle
· 8h ago
80% win rate? Bro, you need to back it up with delivery receipts. Backtested results are two different things from live trading.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 8h ago
80% win rate? Sounds suspicious, but recently I did notice that with too many indicators stacked, they start to contradict each other.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearcher
· 8h ago
Based on on-chain data and market microstructure, the effectiveness of this minimalist strategy indeed warrants in-depth analysis. The phenomenon of decision paralysis caused by information overload has been repeatedly confirmed within behavioral finance and game theory frameworks. It is worth noting that if the 80% win rate data undergoes statistical testing (confidence intervals, sample size, time span, etc.), it would be even more convincing—friends are advised to publish a white paper-level complete parameter set, otherwise it risks falling into survivor bias. Speaking of which, Vitalik also mentioned the principle of "complexity equals fragility" in a speech, and this logic applies equally to trading systems.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 8h ago
80% win rate? Is this guy bragging? Haven't tested it in actual combat for a few months.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 8h ago
80% win rate? I feel like the story is too perfect... Can it really be this stable in actual combat?
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBro
· 8h ago
80% win rate? I don't believe you. You'd better ask your friends when the market will stabilize to achieve this number.
Trading is really just about one word—complexity. Too many indicators can actually cause confusion; combining MACD, Bollinger Bands, KDJ all together, and in the end, you don't know whose advice to follow. A friend recently came up with something quite interesting: he cut down the #Strategy加仓BTC and $BTC operations to their core, removing all the flashy stuff, and focused only on a few solid signals. The result was a consistent win rate of around 80% in actual trading.
Basically, it's about doing subtraction—fewer variables make it easier to find patterns. Especially in this market cycle, although Bitcoin and Ethereum are quite volatile, simplifying the approach actually helps catch those true turning points. Many people end up losing money because of information overload, with a bunch of indicators contradicting each other, causing their psychological defenses to collapse.
Minimalist trading strategies may sound a bit risky, but data speaks for itself—win rate is something you can't be fooled by.