Sometimes, you need to seriously consider those who are receptive to feedback. This developer did a good job—he didn't choose to impose a blanket restriction on the entire community discussion space, but instead delved into the root of the problem (comparable to governance of spammy information projects). This is truly the right way to solve the problem. This user-oriented approach is indeed commendable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotFinancialAdvice
· 7h ago
Listening to this developer's move, there's definitely something to it.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 7h ago
Listen to feedback without arrogance—that's what a true developer should be like.
View OriginalReply0
HodlAndChill
· 7h ago
Developers who are receptive to feedback are really rare; this guy understands.
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 7h ago
Developers who are receptive to feedback are indeed rare; this guy is quite smart.
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 7h ago
Trust me, this is what true governance looks like. Unlike some projects that simply ban discussions, this guy is really tough.
View OriginalReply0
ETH_Maxi_Taxi
· 7h ago
There aren't many developers who can take feedback seriously, but this guy really has something.
Sometimes, you need to seriously consider those who are receptive to feedback. This developer did a good job—he didn't choose to impose a blanket restriction on the entire community discussion space, but instead delved into the root of the problem (comparable to governance of spammy information projects). This is truly the right way to solve the problem. This user-oriented approach is indeed commendable.