AI-generated video has made headlines for years with stunning visual breakthroughs. Yet in reality, most of these solutions struggle when deployed at scale in actual production environments.



The disconnect is clear: many AI video platforms prioritize visual spectacle during demos rather than focusing on consistency and reliability.

The problems compound quickly. Frames drift between shots. Lighting conditions suddenly shift. Product details morph unexpectedly. Brand logos don't stay where they should be. This works fine in promotional clips and concept videos.

But the moment you need production-grade accuracy—like in e-commerce product photography, digital advertising campaigns, or commercial content—these tools fall short. The inconsistencies become glaring, and the costs of manual correction often exceed the time saved by automation.

The real challenge isn't creating impressive single frames. It's maintaining frame-to-frame stability, predictable lighting, and precise product representation across entire sequences.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 7h ago
Basically, these AI video tools are all "paper tigers" — flashy demos and tricks, but they all crash when actually used.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 7h ago
It's the same old trick. It shines brightly in the demo, but the true nature is revealed in the production environment. This is survivor bias — we only see that perfect shot, never the ninety-nine frames that were cut out behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTellervip
· 7h ago
Damn, isn't this just a true reflection of most AI video tools today? They can only act, but fail completely when it comes to practical implementation.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetectivevip
· 7h ago
It's the same old trick again, the demo videos look glamorous, but once they go live in production, they fall flat... There must be a financial chain behind it operating. I've seen through it long ago. Can the data during promotion be the same as the actual deployment? This is a typical "whale manipulation" operation. Frame drift, light flickering, logo misalignment... and so on. Are these "bugs" really technical issues? Or are they deliberately left as gaps to trap users? The e-commerce part is where the real money is. Once things go wrong, the cost is sky-high. Isn't this just a way to cut profits?
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDovip
· 7h ago
To be honest, this is the flaw of AI videos—flashy during demos, but full of bugs when actually used. The framework jitters randomly, the lighting jumps around, and product details suddenly deform... who can stand that? E-commerce still requires manual fixes; it doesn't save a few hours—in fact, it creates more work.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)