A significant court ruling has clarified the boundaries between homebuyer maintenance organizations and real-world asset (RWA) initiatives when dealing with developer insolvencies. The Supreme Court determined that neither homebuyers' societies nor RWA structures can unilaterally intervene in the formal insolvency procedures of developer firms. This decision establishes important legal precedent for how decentralized or community-based entities interact with traditional bankruptcy frameworks. The ruling underscores that insolvency processes must follow established legal channels rather than being subject to external intervention by property-related associations or tokenized asset representatives. For the broader RWA ecosystem—where real estate and physical assets are increasingly being represented on blockchain—the judgment suggests clear demarcation lines: while RWAs can represent ownership stakes, they cannot circumvent formal legal procedures when developers face financial distress. This has implications for how RWA projects structure their governance and involvement in crisis situations affecting underlying real-world collateral.