2026-01-15 19:45:00

Here's the thing about crypto projects: having a solid value proposition doesn't automatically translate into product-market fit. Yeah, sounds obvious, but it's where most teams actually stumble.

You see plenty of projects with genuine innovation and teams grinding 24/7, building something real for tomorrow. The tech might be sound, the vision compelling. But here's what kills them—they're essentially building in isolation. Without real market feedback, without users actually testing and demanding improvements, there's no PMF. It's that simple.

The gap between "we built something cool" and "the market actually wants this" is where projects die. That feedback loop isn't optional.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PanicSeller

· 7h ago

To be honest, this is why so many projects ultimately fail... No matter how hard the team works, it's useless if no one uses what they've developed. Every day, some projects boast about their advanced technology and noble ideals, but then they are ruthlessly educated by the market. It's hilarious—they completely fail to understand what users actually want. Projects without feedback loops are just waiting to die. Users are the harshest judges. If no one uses your product, there is no market. Even the most solid value proposition is pointless. That's why I now always check community reactions before investing in anything. Reliable projects already have users lining up; there's really no need for marketing hype.

View OriginalReply0

ServantOfSatoshi

· 14h ago

You're absolutely right. Working in isolation and pushing projects to failure without external input is a fool's errand. The user is the real truth. Without their feedback, you wouldn't even know what you're doing wrong. That's why so many technically talented teams ultimately end up failing.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichDetector

· 14h ago

Closed-door development has really killed off a bunch of projects. Good technology is useless without user feedback; it's just a paper tiger.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 14h ago

That's why so many projects fail because no one uses them... No matter how advanced the technology is, without market recognition, it's all pointless.

View OriginalReply0

LadderToolGuy

· 14h ago

In plain terms, building in isolation is like digging a hole for yourself; no matter how advanced the technology is, if no one uses it, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoWageSlave

· 14h ago

ngl That's why so many projects fail; they just keep reinventing the wheel without users... Really, no matter how advanced the technology is, if there's no user demand, it's all pointless. PMF (Product-Market Fit) is just a false proposition. Actually, what’s missing is that feedback. Without users, you have no idea where you're going wrong. By the way, do your projects currently have real user feedback? Or are you just sitting alone in front of the computer, building in isolation? Thinking about this just makes me frustrated. Clearly, the technology isn't the problem; it's dying because they can't find product-market fit.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 14h ago

ngl That's why most projects ultimately fade away—building things nobody uses in silence... Really, no matter how excellent the technical team is, if they don't listen to the market, failure is deserved. PMF (Product-Market Fit) boils down to one question: do people really want your product? Many projects die here, what a pity.

View OriginalReply0