Kaito's operating model is essentially an information intermediary—project teams pay, KOLs handle promotion, and the platform takes a commission. This model seems to make quick money, but it has a fatal flaw: over-reliance on a single social platform. As long as that platform changes its rules or adjusts its algorithms, the entire ecosystem could collapse instantly.
Recently, the performance of $KAITO has confirmed this. The token dropped 15% in a short period, and the staking rewards for holders shrank accordingly. This not only reflects the market's re-pricing of project risks but also reminds us—projects that are entirely bound to a single channel are often much more vulnerable to risks than we imagine. A sustainable business model requires diversified revenue streams and stronger self-sustaining capabilities.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TheShibaWhisperer
· 15h ago
One word, crisp. What information intermediaries fear most is the disappearance of the middlemen; the ending has already been written.
View OriginalReply0
MemeTokenGenius
· 15h ago
Honestly, Kaito is just a fragile project hanging by a thread.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNomad
· 15h ago
To be honest, the routine of information intermediaries should have been over long ago. Relying on a single platform is indeed a dead end.
---
$KAITO dropping 15% is not surprising at all. This kind of model has zero resilience against shocks.
---
Another project that’s "GG" once the platform changes rules—just looking at it is exhausting.
---
Projects without diversified income sources are doomed no matter what they say.
---
Staking yields shrinking... how frustrated must the holders be right now?
---
It feels like Kaito has had a bomb planted long ago, just waiting for the right moment to explode.
---
I used to think information intermediaries could last long-term, now I understand.
---
Once this wave of decline hits, they’ll probably shake out another round of retail investors.
---
If you’re poor at risk management, don’t pretend to be part of the ecosystem. Just admit you’re here to cut the leeks—that’s more honest.
---
Binding to a single channel, to put it bluntly, is systemic risk.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 15h ago
I think this is a dead end. The intermediary model is originally based on exploiting information asymmetry. Once the platform changes its stance, the game is over.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 16h ago
Basically, it's just exploiting information asymmetry, and it won't last long.
Kaito's operating model is essentially an information intermediary—project teams pay, KOLs handle promotion, and the platform takes a commission. This model seems to make quick money, but it has a fatal flaw: over-reliance on a single social platform. As long as that platform changes its rules or adjusts its algorithms, the entire ecosystem could collapse instantly.
Recently, the performance of $KAITO has confirmed this. The token dropped 15% in a short period, and the staking rewards for holders shrank accordingly. This not only reflects the market's re-pricing of project risks but also reminds us—projects that are entirely bound to a single channel are often much more vulnerable to risks than we imagine. A sustainable business model requires diversified revenue streams and stronger self-sustaining capabilities.